Index › Products › Aim Security · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Aim Security

6Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

5 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Aim Security was named 4 times in AI security, where SentinelOne Singularity led with 11%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market49 of 233

under the label threshold

Enterprise62 of 155

under the label threshold

In ai security · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Aim Security for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
AI security platforms	Security operations	0%	49 of 233	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by SentinelOne Singularity at 11%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Aim Security yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Aim Security across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labels1

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Strong real-time AI firewall for apps/employees; now part of Cato” Grok 4.1 Fast · AI security · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Acts as an AI firewall for enterprise AI applications” GLM 4.7 FlashX · AI security · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Aim Security, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Aim Security was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

HiddenLayer3 of 60Not among the top eight

Reco3 of 60Not among the top eight

CalypsoAI2 of 60Not among the top eight

CrowdStrike Falcon AIDR2 of 60Not among the top eight

Lakera Guard2 of 60Not among the top eight

Lasso Security2 of 60Not among the top eight

Mindgard2 of 60Not among the top eight

Noma Security2 of 60Not among the top eight

Protect AI2 of 60Not among the top eight

SentinelOne's Prompt Security1 of 61Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Aim Security. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 6 answers that named Aim Security and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

reco.ai5

venn.com3

witness.ai3

ai.cc2

aikido.dev2

akto.io2

checkpoint.com2

getmaxim.ai2

mindgard.ai2

aimultiple.com1

No domain is on file for Aim Security, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

reco.ai/compare/ai-security-tools-for-enterprises5

venn.com/learn/ai-security/ai-security-tools3

ai.cc/news/top-10-enterprise-ai-security-tools-20262

aikido.dev/blog/llm-security-tools2

akto.io/blog/ai-security-tools2

witness.ai/blog/best-llm-security-tools2

aimultiple.com/llm-security-tools1

aimultiple.com/responsible-ai-platform1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow Aim Security

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Aim Security's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Aim Security, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Aim Security by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Aim Security is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Aim Security, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.