IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Azure Front Door · September 2026 Edition
Azure · 2 categories · Named, not ranked

Azure Front Door

11Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
4 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Azure Front Door was named 5 times in CDN and 1 other category, where Cloudflare led with 80%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In cdn · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Azure Front Door for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Content delivery networksNetwork and edge0%13 of 4025%4under 10 labels · led by Cloudflare at 80%
Web application firewallsNetwork and edge0%36 of 870%1under 10 labels · led by Cloudflare at 55%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Azure Front Door yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Azure Front Door across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01113
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The Best for Cloud Consolidation: AWS CloudFront or Azure Front Door.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CDN · scale prompt · alternative
“if you are a Microsoft shop, Azure Front Door is your answer” Qwen 3.7 Flash · WAF · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Hyperscalers with High Egress Fees (Be Cautious of Cost Traps)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CDN · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Azure Front Door, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Azure Front Door was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Cloudflare11 of 118Not in the top three
Amazon CloudFront10 of 110Not in the top three
Fastly9 of 111Not in the top three
Akamai8 of 113Not in the top three
Google Cloud CDN7 of 110Not in the top three
Bunny.net6 of 111Not in the top three
Edgio4 of 110Not in the top three
KeyCDN4 of 110Not in the top three
Alibaba Cloud CDN2 of 110Not in the top three
CDNetworks2 of 110Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Azure Front Door. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 11 answers that named Azure Front Door and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

accio.com1
astravconsulting.com1
best4beginners.com1
blog.blazingcdn.com1
blog.openreplay.com1
cdn07.com1
comparethestack.com1
egresscost.com1
fastly.com1
flashedgecdn.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Azure Front Door came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Azure Front Door

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Azure Front Door; a claim can dispute any of them.
Microsoft Azure Front Door 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Azure Front Door's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Azure Front Door, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at azure.cn is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack