| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content delivery networks | Network and edge | 0% | 9 of 49 | 0% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Cloudflare at 68% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Load balancers | Network and edge | 0% | 20 of 94 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by HAProxy at 29% | |
| Bot management | Network and edge | 0% | 30 of 83 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Cloudflare Bot Management at 56% | |
| Web application firewalls | Network and edge | 0% | 51 of 82 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Cloudflare WAF at 69% | goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDN | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 → 9 of 49 |
| Load balancers | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 20 of 94, unchanged |
| Bot management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 30 of 83, unchanged |
| WAF | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 28 → 51 of 82 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Front Door provides integrated caching, WAF, and performance-based routing with anycast entry points.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Load balancers · negative prompt · alternative
“AWS CloudFront or Azure Front Door can integrate tightly with your existing cloud stack” GLM 4.7 FlashX · CDN · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Same for Google Cloud CDN / Microsoft Azure Front Door if you're on those clouds.” Muse Glimmer 30B · CDN · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“The Public Cloud Partner (e.g., AWS CloudFront, Azure Front Door)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CDN · scale prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 32 of the 41 answers that named Azure Front Door and are not a share of its labels.
Ninety-three of the ninety-three domain citations in answers naming Azure Front Door came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Azure Front Door's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Azure Front Door, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Azure Front Door by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: