IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Amazon CloudFront · September 2026 Edition
Amazon · 1 category · Ranked

Amazon CloudFront

152Judge labels
2First choices
33Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
5% in CDN for enterprise buyers
Rank 5 of 40 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 18% of its 51 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In cdn · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Amazon CloudFront for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Content delivery networksNetwork and edge0%5 of 4018%51accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Amazon CloudFront yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Amazon CloudFront across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.503115
GPT-5.4 mini03003
Gemini 3.5 Flash05016
Perplexity Sonar03003
Grok 4.1 Fast04116
Mistral Small02103
DeepSeek V4 Flash04116
Llama 4 Maverick01102
Qwen 3.7 Flash02024
Kimi K202013
GLM 4.7 FlashX03115
MiniMax M2.503115

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct31 labelsNone
Paraphrase25 labelsNone
Comparative33 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained21 labels2
Scale-constrained18 labelsNone
Negative24 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative152 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“CloudFront and Google Cloud CDN are the obvious picks if you're already embedded in their respective cloud ecosystems” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CDN · comparative prompt · alternative
“Other options to consider are Cloudflare, Akamai, Amazon CloudFront, Fastly, and Google Media CDN” Llama 4 Maverick · CDN · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Akamai, Cloudflare, CloudFront, Fastly, Google Cloud CDN generally show the most reliable uptime” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CDN · negative prompt · alternative
“AWS CloudFront | AWS integration, reliable | $0.085+ | Cheap for high volume w/ reserves.” Grok 4.1 Fast · CDN · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“All major CDNs studied (including Cloudflare, Microsoft Azure, Amazon, and Fastly) have been found to have back-end TLS connections vulnerable” Claude Haiku 4.5 · CDN · negative prompt · soft negative
“AWS CloudFront, Azure CDN | Backend HTTP/ weak crypto allowances; outage propagation. Heavy logging (personal data under GDPR).” Grok 4.1 Fast · CDN · negative prompt · soft negative
“Other commonly abused CDNs: CloudFront, Webflow CDN, Google APIs (these are abused because of their trusted domain reputation)” MiniMax M2.5 · CDN · negative prompt · soft negative
“CloudFront has suffered from specific architectural flaws that can lead to significant data exposure.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · CDN · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Amazon CloudFront, over the 151 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Amazon CloudFront was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Cloudflare147 of 151104Not in the top three
Fastly119 of 1514Not in the top three
Akamai103 of 15119Not in the top three
Bunny.net81 of 15111Not in the top three
Google Cloud CDN43 of 1510Not in the top three
KeyCDN35 of 1511Not in the top three
Azure CDN19 of 1510Not in the top three
CDN7717 of 1510Not in the top three
BlazingCDN14 of 1513Not in the top three
Edgio14 of 1510Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Amazon CloudFront. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 109 of the 151 answers that named Amazon CloudFront and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

blog.blazingcdn.com88
fastly.com59
yewsafe.com42
broadbandnow.com27
techradar.com27
wpforms.com27
edgenext.com26
linkedin.com24
cloudinsight.cc21
g2.com19

360 of the 360 domain citations in answers naming Amazon CloudFront came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Amazon CloudFront

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Amazon CloudFront; a claim can dispute any of them.
AWS CloudFront 22CloudFront 5Amazon 2Amazon CloudFront (AWS) 1Amazon Cloudfront 1CloudFront (AWS) 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Amazon CloudFront's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Amazon CloudFront, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at amazoncloudfront.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack