Index › Vendors › AWS Security Hub + GuardDuty · September 2026 Edition

AWS · 2 categories · Named, not ranked

AWS Security Hub + GuardDuty

4Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. AWS Security Hub + GuardDuty was named 2 times in CNAPP and 1 other category, where Wiz led with 46%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business27 of 67

under the label threshold

Mid-market53 of 57

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In cnapp · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named AWS Security Hub + GuardDuty for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Cloud-native application protection	Cloud and infrastructure	0%	53 of 57	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Wiz at 46%
Cloud security posture management	Cloud and infrastructure	0%	37 of 53	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Wiz at 43%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for AWS Security Hub + GuardDuty yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated AWS Security Hub + GuardDuty across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“They are optimized for their own clouds and often treat multi-cloud as second-class.” Kimi K2 · CNAPP · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as AWS Security Hub + GuardDuty, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AWS Security Hub + GuardDuty was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Defender for Cloud4 of 41Not in the top three

Prisma Cloud4 of 40Not in the top three

Wiz4 of 40Not in the top three

Aqua Security2 of 40Not in the top three

Check Point CloudGuard2 of 40Not in the top three

Google Security Command Center2 of 40Not in the top three

Orca2 of 40Not in the top three

CrowdStrike1 of 40Not in the top three

Falco1 of 40Not in the top three

Lacework FortiCNAPP1 of 40Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AWS Security Hub + GuardDuty. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 4 answers that named AWS Security Hub + GuardDuty and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cybersecurityessential.com2

decryptiondigest.com2

aikido.dev1

archivemarketresearch.com1

cdn-dynmedia-1.microsoft.com1

cipherssecurity.com1

cloudaware.com1

cyberpress.org1

cybersecuritynews.com1

expertinsights.com1

No domain is on file for AWS Security Hub + GuardDuty, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

cybersecurityessential.com/cloud-security/cnapp/wiz-orca-prisma-cloud-cnapp-compared2

decryptiondigest.com/blog/best-cnapp-platforms-20262

aikido.dev/blog/top-cloud-native-application-protection-platforms-cnapp1

archivemarketresearch.com/reports/cloud-native-application-protection-platform-3645971

cdn-dynmedia-1.microsoft.com/is/content/microsoftcorp/microsoft/bade/documents/products-an1

cipherssecurity.com/cnapp-buyers-guide-20261

cloudaware.com/blog/cnapp-tools1

cyberpress.org/cnapp-platforms-by-business-size-21

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as AWS Security Hub + GuardDuty

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as AWS Security Hub + GuardDuty; a claim can dispute any of them.

AWS Security Hub/GuardDuty 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AWS Security Hub + GuardDuty's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AWS Security Hub + GuardDuty, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.