Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
AWS · 4 categories · Named, not rankedAWS CloudWatch
16Judge labels
0First choices
9Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. AWS CloudWatch was named 6 times in Observability and 3 other categories, where Grafana led with 27%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market77 of 80
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise27 of 57
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In observability · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named AWS CloudWatch for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observability platforms | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 77 of 80 | 67% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Grafana at 27% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AIOps platforms | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 58 of 93 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by New Relic at 17% | |
| Cloud cost management | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 72 of 76 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Vantage at 45% | |
| Telemetry pipelines | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 52 of 124 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by OpenTelemetry Collector at 37% |
Movement
Since September 2026, AWS CloudWatch held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Observability · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 55 → 73 of 76
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 26 of 56, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observability | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 55 → 77 of 80 |
| AIOps | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 58 of 93, unchanged |
| FinOps | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 72 of 76, unchanged |
| Telemetry pipelines | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 52 of 124, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated AWS CloudWatch across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated AWS CloudWatch across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative8 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Datadog or Honeycomb + AWS CloudWatch” Mistral Small · Telemetry pipelines · scale prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“G2 users consistently flag AWS CloudWatch for a confusing pricing structure, especially with high log volume leading to unexpected costs” Muse Glimmer 30B · FinOps · negative prompt · soft negative
“If you're single-cloud and want deep integration. Trade-off: Multi-cloud/hybrid pain.” Kimi K2 · Observability · scale prompt · soft negative
“Deeply integrated with AWS services; moving metrics/logs out can be cumbersome” MiniMax M2.5 · Observability · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as AWS CloudWatch, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AWS CloudWatch was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as AWS CloudWatch, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AWS CloudWatch was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AWS CloudWatch. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 16 answers that named AWS CloudWatch and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
openobserve.ai5
aws.amazon.com3
coralogix.com3
g2.com3
gartner.com3
ir.com3
newrelic.com3
scribd.com3
viasocket.com3
checkthat.ai2
Thirty-one of the thirty-one domain citations in answers naming AWS CloudWatch came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
awscloud.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, AWS CloudWatch takes 0% of first choices and Grafana takes 27%.ShowHide
Search and answers
awscloud.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, AWS CloudWatch takes 0% of first choices and Grafana takes 27%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “observability platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “observability platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,400 a month (“aws cloudwatch”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 266 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 78,621 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 5,665 · 172 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 7,608
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 2 clicks and $68 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 77 of 80 in observability
Segment leader
27%
Grafana
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 16 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 12 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on awscloud.com
3,576
subdomains included
Content
30
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
0 · 3,531
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 18 | undated | SOAR | ||
| Blog | 6 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 3 | undated | |||
| Case study | 1 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated | WAF |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page awscloud.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as AWS CloudWatch
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as AWS CloudWatch; a claim can dispute any of them.
AWS CloudWatch/Otel 1
Follow AWS CloudWatch
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
AWS is the company behind AWS CloudWatch.ShowHide
The company
AWS is the company behind AWS CloudWatch.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from AWS
- AWS ACM, AWS ACM Private CA, AWS ALB, AWS ALB/ELB, AWS ALB/NLB, AWS API Gateway HTTP APIs, AWS Amazon Aurora, AWS App Runner and 87 more
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Free plan or trial
- Free to join, pay only for what you use. awscloud.com
- Hosting
- 124 Availability Zones within 39 Geographic Regions31 Availability Zones within 9 Geographic Regions9 Geographic Regions
- Customers named
- Siemens MobilityBooking.comAudiUnitedTUI
- Not stated on the pages read
- Positioning, who it is for, price, starting price, integrations, certifications
What AWS CloudWatch's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: awscloud.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AWS CloudWatch's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AWS CloudWatch, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for AWS CloudWatch by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where AWS CloudWatch is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name AWS CloudWatch, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.