AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Appknox · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Appknox

3Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Appknox was named 1 time in App shielding, where Appdome led with 33%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business29 of 100
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market16 of 87
2%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In app shielding · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Appknox for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Application shieldingDeveloper platform2%16 of 870%1under 10 labels · led by Appdome at 33%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Appknox yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Appknox across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash10001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 label1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 label1not counted in share
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Appknox is widely considered the top overall choice for mid-market organizations” Qwen 3.7 Flash · App shielding · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Appknox, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Appknox was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Apiiro1 of 30Not among the top eight
Appdome1 of 30Not among the top eight
ArmorCode1 of 30Not among the top eight
Cycode ASPM1 of 30Not among the top eight
Fortify Mobile Security1 of 30Not among the top eight
Jscrambler1 of 30Not among the top eight
MobSF1 of 30Not among the top eight
NowSecure AppSec Platform1 of 30Not among the top eight
OX Security1 of 30Not among the top eight
Snyk AppRisk1 of 30Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Appknox. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named Appknox and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com3
guptadeepak.com3
appknox.comYour site2
g2.com2
topbusinesssoftware.com2
worldmetrics.org2
zipdo.co2
armorcode.com1
checkmarx.com1
cyberdefenders.org1

Seventeen of the nineteen domain citations in answers naming Appknox came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/in-app-protection2
guptadeepak.com/tools/top-5-mobile-app-security-tools-20262
topbusinesssoftware.com/categories/application-shielding/small-business-orgs2
worldmetrics.org/best/application-shielding-software2
zipdo.co/best/application-shielding-software2
appknox.com/1
appknox.com/all-features1
appknox.com/blog/aspm-enterprise-app-security-guide1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on appknox.com
590
subdomains included
Content
463
counted in the table below
Documentation
7
Product · Integration
4 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog26012026-07-29DAST, SAST
Report or ebook6002026-05-07
Webinar or virtual event5502026-03-01
Template or tool2602026-02-13
Comparison2322026-09-11SAST, ASPM
Conference or event17undated
Case study1602025-04-04
Glossary or explainer602021-11-16

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page appknox.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Appknox

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Appknox is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Mobile Application Security Testing
appknox.com
For
Developers; Security teams; DevSecOps; enterprises across industries
appknox.com
Price stated
transparent pricing with no hidden fees appknox.com
Free plan or trial
Start a free trial appknox.com
Certifications
PCI-DSSGDPRHIPAAOWASP MASVS
Hosting
SingaporeIndiaUSA
Customers named
Global leader in oil and gasGlobal retail leaderFinancial governing body in IndiaLeading global airline in SEALeading Indian bankMinistry of Health in GCCLeading bank in NigeriaLeading bank in Indonesia
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, integrations

What Appknox's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: appknox.com, appknox.com/pricing, appknox.com/compliance, appknox.com/solutions/internet-companies, appknox.com/resources/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Appknox's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Appknox, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Appknox by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Appknox is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Appknox, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at appknox.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.