Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 21 of 50, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedAPI Portal
2Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. API Portal was named 1 time in API management, where Kong Gateway led with 37%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market24 of 61
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise31 of 75
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In api management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named API Portal for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| API management | Developer platform | 0% | 24 of 61 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Kong Gateway at 37% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, API Portal held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · API management · by segment
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 30 of 71, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| API management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 24 of 61, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated API Portal across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated API Portal across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“API Portal (Best for Developer Experience)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · API management · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as API Portal, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and API Portal was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as API Portal, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and API Portal was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named API Portal. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named API Portal and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
api-portal.ioYour site2
ibm.com2
allbusinessjournal.com1
aws.amazon.com1
dckap.com1
f6s.com1
gravitee.io1
hyscaler.com1
itechguides.com1
itechnolabs.ca1
Ten of the twelve domain citations in answers naming API Portal came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on api-portal.io
152
subdomains included
Content
52
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
13 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 41 | 3 | 2026-08-04 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 6 | 0 | 2026-06-23 | ||
| Comparison | 4 | 1 | 2026-07-14 | API gateways | |
| Case study | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-08-04Arazzo 1 1 whats new blog
- 2026-07-27Arazzo workflows in the api catalog blog
- 2026-07-22Api composition orchestration aggregation blog
- 2026-07-14Api orchestration vs api gateway comparison
- 2026-07-06Orchestration vs choreography comparison
- 2026-07-01Arazzo workflow tutorial blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page api-portal.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.
Follow API Portal
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
API Portal is its own company.ShowHide
The company
API Portal is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The central API developer portal for API management, documentation, and versioning.
- For
- Modern API teams
- Price stated
- On request api-portal.io
- Free plan or trial
- Free 14-day trial api-portal.io
- Integrations claimed
- 3 api-portal.io
- Certifications
- GDPR-compliant
- Hosting
- EU data centers in Frankfurt
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, customers
What API Portal's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: api-portal.io, api-portal.io/en/product/ai/mcp-server. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when API Portal's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as API Portal, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for API Portal by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where API Portal is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name API Portal, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.