IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Amazon CloudWatch Logs · September 2026 Edition

Amazon · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Amazon CloudWatch Logs

11Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Amazon CloudWatch Logs was named 5 times in Logs, where Datadog Log Management led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business26 of 53

under the label threshold

Mid-market26 of 59

under the label threshold

Enterprise23 of 54

under the label threshold

In logs · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Amazon CloudWatch Logs for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Log management	IT operations and endpoint	0%	26 of 59	20%	5	under 10 labels · led by Datadog Log Management at 20%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Amazon CloudWatch Logs yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Amazon CloudWatch Logs across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	2	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Already deep in one cloud and want simplest setup: Cloud-native logging” GPT-5.4 mini · Logs · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“both log ingestion and—critically—data *retrieval/querying* ... are priced per GB” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Logs · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Amazon CloudWatch Logs, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Amazon CloudWatch Logs was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Datadog Log Management10 of 112Not in the top three

Splunk10 of 112Not in the top three

Grafana Loki9 of 113Not in the top three

Elastic Stack8 of 110Not in the top three

Azure Monitor6 of 110Not in the top three

New Relic Logs6 of 110Not in the top three

Google Cloud Logging5 of 110Not in the top three

Sumo Logic4 of 111Not in the top three

SolarWinds Papertrail3 of 111Not in the top three

Graylog3 of 110Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Amazon CloudWatch Logs. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 11 answers that named Amazon CloudWatch Logs and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

subrupt.com2

toolradar.com2

401clicks.com1

apistatuscheck.com1

betterstack.com1

checkthat.ai1

comparitech.com1

coralogix.com1

cribl.io1

cubeapm.com1

Twelve of the twelve domain citations in answers naming Amazon CloudWatch Logs came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

subrupt.com/best/log-management2

401clicks.com/blog/best-log-management-tools-for-small-teams-in-20261

apistatuscheck.com/blog/best-log-management-tools-20261

betterstack.com/community/comparisons/datadog-pricing-gotchas1

checkthat.ai/answers/what-are-the-best-log-management-tools1

comparitech.com/net-admin/log-management-tools1

coralogix.com/guides/best-log-analysis-tools1

coralogix.com/guides/top-log-management-tools-compared1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Amazon CloudWatch Logs

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Amazon CloudWatch Logs; a claim can dispute any of them.

AWS CloudWatch 3AWS CloudWatch Logs 1CloudWatch (AWS) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Amazon CloudWatch Logs's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Amazon CloudWatch Logs, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at amazon.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.