Every category where a model named CDN77 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Content delivery networks	Network and edge	0%	8 of 40	0%	11	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CDN77 yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CDN77 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	0	2
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“offering "best mid-market value." ... Cons: Higher entry cost than Bunny or Cloudflare's paid plans.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CDN · direct prompt · alternative

“CDN77 is a top pick if you want enterprise\u2011grade features at mid\u2011market pricing” GLM 4.7 FlashX · CDN · direct prompt · alternative

“Better alternatives: EU/Swiss like CDN77, KeyCDN (GDPR-native, Swiss privacy)” Grok 4.1 Fast · CDN · negative prompt · alternative

“Choose CDN77 if you need mid-market value and good European performance” Perplexity Sonar · CDN · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CDN77, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CDN77 was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Cloudflare22 of 2316Not in the top three

Bunny.net21 of 235Not in the top three

Amazon CloudFront17 of 231Not in the top three

Fastly14 of 230Not in the top three

Akamai13 of 231Not in the top three

KeyCDN11 of 230Not in the top three

Google Cloud CDN6 of 230Not in the top three

Azure CDN5 of 230Not in the top three

BlazingCDN3 of 230Not in the top three

Gcore3 of 230Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CDN77. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 23 answers that named CDN77 and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

blog.blazingcdn.com19

wpforms.com13

broadbandnow.com9

fastly.com9

linkedin.com9

toolradar.com8

yewsafe.com7

ioriver.io5

sourceforge.net5

techradar.com5

Eighty-nine of the eighty-nine domain citations in answers naming CDN77 came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

wpforms.com/best-cdn-providers13

blog.blazingcdn.com/en-us/top-cdn-providers-2025-an-expert-guide-to-types-technologies-and10

broadbandnow.com/guides/CDN-Providers9

toolradar.com/best/cdn8

blog.blazingcdn.com/en-us/the-best-cdns-in-2026-compared-by-speed-price-and-global-coverag7

fastly.com/blog/best-cdn-providers7

blog.blazingcdn.com/en-us/top-cdn-providers-2025-an-expert-guide-to-types-technologies-and6

linkedin.com/pulse/choosing-best-cdn-top-content-delivery-networks-2026-rajesh-kumar-ua4ac6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CDN77's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CDN77, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cdn77.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.