Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 55 of 61, unchanged
3 categories · Named, not rankedAlteryx
17Judge labels
0First choices
13Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Alteryx was named 6 times in ETL and 2 other categories, where Fivetran led with 40%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business56 of 62
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market71 of 75
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise58 of 72
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In etl · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Alteryx for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETL and ELT | Data platform | 0% | 71 of 75 | 75% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Fivetran at 40% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Data quality and observability | Data platform | 0% | 98 of 110 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Metaplane at 31% | |
| ML platforms | Data platform | 0% | 85 of 107 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Azure Machine Learning at 21% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Alteryx held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · ETL · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 49 → 65 of 69
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 23 → 48 of 64
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETL | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 49 → 71 of 75 |
| Data observability | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 98 of 110, unchanged |
| ML platforms | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 69 → 85 of 107 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Alteryx across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Alteryx across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative10 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Users experience slow performance, particularly with large workflows and data wrangling tasks” MiniMax M2.5 · ETL · negative prompt · soft negative
“they can be problematic for dedicated data science teams... "Black Box" Limitations” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ML platforms · negative prompt · soft negative
“Slow performance on large datasets/workflows; steep learning curve” Grok 4.20 · ETL · negative prompt · soft negative
“Cons: Not designed for production monitoring” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Data observability · comparative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Alteryx, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Alteryx was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Alteryx, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Alteryx was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Alteryx. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 17 answers that named Alteryx and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com11
fivetran.com8
airbyte.com6
learn.g2.com6
linkedin.com6
skyvia.com6
hevodata.com5
dataquest.io4
estuary.dev4
funnel.io4
Sixty of the sixty domain citations in answers naming Alteryx came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on alteryx.com
12,107
subdomains included
Content
5,460
counted in the table below
Documentation
6,345
Product · Integration
86 · 22
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Template or tool | 3,513 | undated | |||
| Blog | 924 | 21 | 2026-09-25 | Data warehouses | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 435 | 13 | 2026-10-23 | Data warehouses | |
| Glossary or explainer | 189 | 4 | 2026-09-21 | ||
| Report or ebook | 179 | 5 | 2026-09-16 | Data warehouses | |
| Case study | 119 | 7 | 2026-08-11 | ||
| Conference or event | 41 | 15 | 2027-12-31 | ||
| Comparison | 39 | 1 | 2026-08-24 | ||
| Podcast or video | 16 | 0 | 2026-02-11 | ||
| News or press | 5 | 0 | 2023-03-11 |
Most recent
- 2027-12-31Alteryx on tour agentic analytics starts here conference or event
- 2026-11-17Office of finance conference or event
- 2026-11-12Amsterdam alteryx on tour conference or event
- 2026-11-04Techtalkalteryx 2026 conference or event
- 2026-10-23Your first claude automation with alteryx webinar or virtual event
- 2026-10-23Alteryx in action practical governance using genai with alteryx webinar or virtual event
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page alteryx.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name data warehouses (10); 0 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Alteryx
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Alteryx; a claim can dispute any of them.
Alteryx / Trifacta 1
Follow Alteryx
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Alteryx is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Alteryx is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI Data Analytics Platform
- For
- analysts and enterprises
- Free plan or trial
- Start Free Trial alteryx.com
- Integrations claimed
- 6 alteryx.com
- Certifications
- ISO 27001:2022SOC 2 Type IIISO 22301:2019CSA STAR 1HIPAAISO 22301 certifiedSOC 2ISO
- Customers named
- Siemens EnergyBank of AmericaCoca ColaBTMcLaren RacingPapa JohnsFWD InsuranceBank al Etihad
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, hosting
What Alteryx's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: alteryx.com, trust.alteryx.com, alteryx.com/platform, alteryx.com/sparked/case-studies, alteryx.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Alteryx's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Alteryx, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Alteryx by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Alteryx is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Alteryx, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.