IT AI Index
Index Vendors › AlienVault Open Threat Exchange · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

AlienVault Open Threat Exchange

5Judge labels
2First choices
1Negative labels
4 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. AlienVault Open Threat Exchange was named 2 times in Threat intel, where NordStellar led with 13%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In threat intel · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named AlienVault Open Threat Exchange for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Threat intelligence platformsSecurity operations2%17 of 1280%2under 10 labels · led by NordStellar at 13%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for AlienVault Open Threat Exchange yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated AlienVault Open Threat Exchange across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast10001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labels2
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd recommend starting with AlienVault Open Threat Exchange (OTX) as your primary threat intelligence feed” Grok 4.1 Fast · Threat intel · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“AlienVault OTX for broad, community-driven IoC feeds” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Threat intel · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as AlienVault Open Threat Exchange, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AlienVault Open Threat Exchange was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
MISP5 of 52Not in the top three
Recorded Future3 of 50Not in the top three
Abuse.ch2 of 50Not in the top three
ThreatConnect2 of 50Not in the top three
Maltiverse1 of 51Not in the top three
AbuseIPDB1 of 50Not in the top three
CISA AIS1 of 50Not in the top three
CISA Cyber Hygiene Services1 of 50Not in the top three
CISA KEV1 of 50Not in the top three
CrowdStrike Falcon Go1 of 50Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AlienVault Open Threat Exchange. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 5 answers that named AlienVault Open Threat Exchange and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

github.com4
b2breviews.com3
cyware.com3
defend.network3
3university.io2
analyticsinsight.net2
brocent.com2
comparitech.com2
esecurityplanet.com2
g2.com2

Twenty-five of the twenty-five domain citations in answers naming AlienVault Open Threat Exchange came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as AlienVault Open Threat Exchange

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as AlienVault Open Threat Exchange; a claim can dispute any of them.
AlienVault Open Threat Exchange (OTX) 2
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AlienVault Open Threat Exchange's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AlienVault Open Threat Exchange, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at alienvault.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack