Backup and disaster recovery for enterprise buyers
Asked as “backup and disaster recovery solution”, and as “data backup and recovery service”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 57 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
32%
Contested · Rubrik Security Cloud 14%
32Veeam Data Platform14Rubrik Security Cloud12Commvault42others
32% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026▼−10Since September 2026: 41% → 31%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Veeam Data Platform held the lead, −10 points on 41%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Acronis Cyber Protect23%Contested▼−18Since September 2026: 41% → 23%, −18 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-market
Veeam Data Platform38%Contested▲+6Since September 2026: 32% → 38%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseVeeam Data Platform32%Contested▼−10Since September 2026: 41% → 31%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This page
Acronis Cyber Protect23%Contested▼−18Since September 2026: 41% → 23%, −18 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketVeeam Data Platform38%Contested▲+6Since September 2026: 32% → 38%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseVeeam Data Platform32%Contested▼−10Since September 2026: 41% → 31%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Veeam Data Platform32%12%51endorsed leader▼−10Since September 2026: 41% → 31%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.41% → 31%
Veeam Data Platform32%12%51endorsed leader▼−10Since September 2026: 41% → 31%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.41% → 31%02
Rubrik Security Cloud14%13%47accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 11% → 16%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.11% → 16%
Rubrik Security Cloud14%13%47accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 11% → 16%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.11% → 16%03
Commvault12%8%49accepted challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 11% → 12%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.11% → 12%
Commvault12%8%49accepted challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 11% → 12%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.11% → 12%04
Cohesity DataProtect9%5%39accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 4% → 10%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 10%
Cohesity DataProtect9%5%39accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 4% → 10%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 10%05
Druva Data Security Cloud9%3%32accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 4% → 10%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 10%
Druva Data Security Cloud9%3%32accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 4% → 10%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 10%06Acronis Cyber Protect5%6%17accepted challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 6%
Acronis Cyber Protect5%6%17accepted challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 6%Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
08
Veritas Alta Data Protection0%17%12accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Veritas Alta Data Protection0%17%12accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%07
Zerto0%0%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Zerto0%0%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to head
All six head-to-head pages: the top four products, each against each
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Veeam Data Platform32%
Veeam Data Platform32%02Rubrik Security Cloud14%
Rubrik Security Cloud14%03Commvault12%
Commvault12%04Cohesity DataProtect9%
Cohesity DataProtect9%05Druva Data Security Cloud9%
Druva Data Security Cloud9%06Acronis Cyber Protect5%
Acronis Cyber Protect5%07Zerto0%
Zerto0%08Veritas Alta Data Protection0%
Veritas Alta Data Protection0%What they warned about
Four of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Veeam Data Platform12%
6 of 51 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“Vendors have disclosed **critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerabilities** (e.g., Veeam CVE‑2026‑44963, Commvault command‑center flaws).” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Dropbox100%
5 of 5 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Using commercial consumer cloud storage (e.g., Dropbox Business or Backblaze Personal plans) without an enterprise license is risky for large enterprises.” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Commvault8%
4 of 49 labels negative · 4 of 14 models
“Commvault | Critical vulnerabilities | CVE-2025-34028 (CVSS 9.0) allowed remote code execution without authentication” Kimi K2, negative prompt
Rubrik Security Cloud13%
6 of 47 labels negative · 4 of 14 models
“Rubrik's capacity-based pricing means every renewal becomes a true-up."it is capacity-based licensing, which...grows with every TB you add” Muse Glimmer 30B, budget prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1145 links across 318 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 42 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Eon38 answers · 73 citations · 11 models
36 answers · 53 citations · 11 models
32 answers · 42 citations · 9 models
26 answers · 26 citations · 10 models
vendor site · NinjaOne24 answers · 28 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Veeam23 answers · 31 citations · 12 models
vendor site · ControlMonkey19 answers · 22 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Cohesity18 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
17 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Guideflow17 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
14 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
vendor site · HYCU13 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
24 answers · 11 models
22 answers · 10 models
22 answers · 9 models
21 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 8 models
15 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 5 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “backup and disaster recovery solution”, “backup and disaster recovery solutions”, “best backup and disaster recovery solution”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Veeam Data Platform veeam.com Veeam Data Platform 32%, Veeam Backup & Replication 4% | 35% | 133 | 720 | 23 | 86,318 | $2,697 | 113 | |
| Rubrik Security Cloud rubrik.com | 14% | 74 | 390 | 3 | 63,198 | 44 | ||
| Commvault commvault.com | 12% | 76 | 9,900 | 577 | 46,519 | $5,364 | 95 | |
| Veritas NetBackup cohesity.com Cohesity DataProtect 9%, Veritas NetBackup 2% | 11% | 58 | 260 | 16 | 36,310 | 63 | ||
| Druva Data Security Cloud druva.com | 9% | 55 | 40 | 0 | 24,186 | 44 | ||
| Acronis Cyber Protect acronis.com | 5% | 129 | 880 | 23 | 166,260 | 42 | 8 | |
| Barracuda barracuda.com | 2% | 12 | 201,000 | 10,561 | 64,778 | 116 | ||
| Barracuda parent site Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup 2% | 2% | 4 | 201,000 | 10,561 | ||||
| Commvault Cloud SaaS | 2% | |||||||
| Dataprise's Backup and Disaster Recovery as a Service | 2% |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 16 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (controlmonkey.io, eon.io, expertinsights.com, solutionsreview.com). The first result for “backup and disaster recovery solution” is axcient.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best backup and disaster recovery solution for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which data backup and recovery service would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade backup and disaster recovery solutions and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best backup and disaster recovery solution for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a backup and disaster recovery solution. What should we look at?”Negative“Which backup and disaster recovery solutions should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceVeeam Data Platform, Veritas NetBackupChangedVeeam Data PlatformBarracudano first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
AWS Backup, Google Cloud Backup and DR Service, Microsoft Azure BackupFour alternatives
Acronis Cyber Protect, Commvault, Druva Data Security Cloud, HPE Zerto SoftwareGPT-5.4 miniAWS Backup, Azure BackupCommvaultChangedVeeam Backup & Replication, Veeam Data PlatformVeeam Data Platformagainst: Microsoft 365 Backupno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
AWS Backup, Google Cloud Backup and DR ServiceFive alternatives
Cohesity DataProtect, Commvault, Druva Data Security Cloud, Rubrik Security Cloud, ZertoTwo alternatives
Commvault, Datto SIRISGemini 3.5 FlashVeeam Data PlatformDruva Data Security Cloud, Rubrik Security CloudChangedno first choiceBarracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup, Druva Data Security Cloudagainst: Commvault, Veeam Data Platformno first choiceagainst: Dropbox, Google Drive
Six alternatives
Cohesity DataProtect, Commvault, Druva Data Security Cloud, HYCU R-Cloud, Rubrik Security Cloud, ZertoTwo alternatives
Commvault, Veeam Data PlatformSix alternatives
Cohesity DataProtect, Commvault, Dell Technologies, Druva Data Security Cloud, Rubrik Security Cloud, Veeam Data PlatformTwo alternatives
Cohesity DataProtect, Cove Data ProtectionPerplexity SonarVeeam Data PlatformCommvaultChangedCommvault, Veeam Data PlatformVeeam Data Platformagainst: Acronis Cyber Protectno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Acronis Cyber Protect, Cohesity DataProtect, Commvault, ZertoThree alternatives
Druva Data Security Cloud, Rubrik Security Cloud, Veeam Data PlatformSeven alternatives
Acronis Cyber Protect, Cohesity DataProtect, Druva Data Security Cloud, HYCU R-Cloud, Microsoft Azure Backup, Rubrik Security Cloud, Veritas NetBackupTwo alternatives
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery, BaculaGrok 4.1 FastVeeam Data PlatformVeeam Data PlatformHeldagainst: Rubrik Security Cloud, Veritas Alta Data ProtectionVeeam Data PlatformCohesity DataProtect, Rubrik Security Cloudagainst: AWS BackupCommvault, Veeam Data Platformagainst: AWS Backup, Azure Backup, Commvault, Druva Data Security Cloud, Unitrends, Veritas Alta Data Protection
Five alternatives
Cohesity DataProtect, Commvault, Dell Technologies, Rubrik Security Cloud, Veritas Alta Data ProtectionTwo alternatives
Cohesity DataProtect, CommvaultFive alternatives
Cohesity DataProtect, Commvault, Dell Technologies, Rubrik Security Cloud, Veritas Alta Data ProtectionTwo alternatives
Commvault, Veeam Data PlatformThree alternatives
Druva Data Security Cloud, Rubrik Security Cloud, ZertoMistral SmallCommvaultCohesity DataProtect, CommvaultChangedVeeam Data PlatformAcronis Cyber Protect, Veeam Data Platformno first choiceagainst: Commvault, Veeam Data Platformagainst: Backblaze Personal, Dropbox, Rubrik Security Cloud
Three alternatives
Cohesity DataProtect, Druva Data Security Cloud, Microsoft Azure Site RecoveryTwo alternatives
Computacenter, Veeam Backup & ReplicationFour alternatives
Commvault, HYCU R-Cloud, Rubrik Security Cloud, ZertoOne alternative
Microsoft Azure Site RecoveryFour alternatives
Cohesity DataProtect, Druva Data Security Cloud, Rubrik Security Cloud, ZertoDeepSeek V4 FlashRubrik Security Cloud, Veeam Data PlatformVeeam Data PlatformChangedagainst: Rubrik Security CloudVeeam Data Platformagainst: Dell TechnologiesDruva Data Security Cloudno first choiceagainst: AWS Backup, Azure Backup, Backblaze Business Backup, Backblaze Personal, CrashPlan, Datto SIRIS, Dropbox, Google Cloud Backup and DR Service, Google Drive personal plans, MSP360 Managed Backup, Rubrik Security Cloud
Five alternatives
Cohesity DataProtect, Commvault, Datto SIRIS, Druva Data Security Cloud, ZertoOne alternative
CommvaultFive alternatives
Acronis Cyber Protect, Cohesity DataProtect, Commvault, Druva Data Security Cloud, Rubrik Security CloudTwo alternatives
Commvault, Veeam Data PlatformLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceDataprise's Backup and Disaster Recovery as a ServiceChangedNinjaOneAcronis Cyber Protectno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
BairesDev, CrashPlan, Datto SIRIS, TierPoint's Data Protection and Disaster Recovery ServicesTwo alternatives
Eon.io, TechRepublicQwen 3.7 FlashVeeam Backup & ReplicationVeeam Backup & ReplicationHeldVeeam Backup & Replicationagainst: Veritas NetBackupAcronis Cyber Protectagainst: Veeam Data Platformno first choiceagainst: Dropbox, Google Drive, Microsoft OneDrive, iCloud
Five alternatives
Cohesity DataProtect, Commvault Complete, Druva Data Security Cloud, Rubrik Security Cloud, Spin RYUThree alternatives
Cohesity DataProtect, Commvault, Rubrik Security CloudThree alternatives
Cohesity DataProtect, Commvault, Rubrik Security CloudKimi K2Rubrik Security Cloud, Veeam Data PlatformRubrik Security Cloud, Veeam Data PlatformHeldVeeam Data Platformagainst: Microsoft 365 Backup, Veritas NetBackupCohesity DataProtectRubrik Security Cloudagainst: AWS, Azure, Commvault, GCP, Microsoft 365, Veeam Data Platform
Two alternatives
Commvault, ZertoThree alternatives
Cohesity DataProtect, Commvault, Druva Data Security CloudFive alternatives
Cohesity DataProtect, Commvault, Druva Data Security Cloud, Rubrik Security Cloud, ZertoThree alternatives
Druva Data Security Cloud, Rubrik Security Cloud, Veeam Data PlatformThree alternatives
Commvault, Druva Data Security Cloud, Veeam Data PlatformGLM 4.7 FlashXVeeam Data PlatformVeeam Data PlatformHeldVeeam Data PlatformCommvault, Druva Data Security Cloudno first choiceagainst: Commvault Cloud Security, Veeam Data Platform
Five alternatives
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery, Azure Site Recovery, Commvault, Druva Data Security Cloud, Rubrik Security CloudThree alternatives
Commvault, Rubrik Security Cloud, Veritas NetBackupSeven alternatives
Acronis Cyber Protect, Cohesity DataProtect, Commvault, Datto SIRIS, Druva Data Security Cloud, Eon, Rubrik Security CloudFour alternatives
AWS Backup, Azure Site Recovery, Rubrik Security Cloud, Veeam Data PlatformMiniMax M2.5Cohesity DataProtectagainst: Unitrends, Veeam Data PlatformRubrik Security Cloud, Veeam Data PlatformChangedno first choiceno first choiceCohesity DataProtect, Druva Data Security Cloud, Rubrik Security Cloudagainst: Backblaze Personal Backup, Backup Exec, Carbonite Safe, MozyHome, Symantec NetBackup
Three alternatives
HYCU R-Cloud, Microsoft, Veritas Alta Data ProtectionThree alternatives
Commvault, Dell Technologies, Veritas Alta Data ProtectionGPT-6 LunaVeeam Data Platformagainst: AWS, AzureRubrik Enterprise EditionChangedCommvault, Veeam Data Platformagainst: IBM Storage ProtectCommvault Cloud SaaSagainst: Cohesity DataProtectno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Commvault, Rubrik Security CloudTwo alternatives
Commvault, Veeam Data PlatformFive alternatives
Cohesity DataProtect, Dell PowerProtect Data Manager, Druva Data Security Cloud, HPE Zerto Software, Rubrik Security CloudOne alternative
Druva Data Security CloudMuse Glimmer 30BVeeam SoftwareCommvaultChangedCommvault, Veeam Data PlatformVeeam Data Platformagainst: Cohesity DataProtect, Rubrik Security Cloudno first choiceagainst: Backblaze Personal, Dropbox, Rubrik Security Cloud
Three alternatives
Cohesity, Inc., Commvault Systems, Inc., Rubrik, Inc.Three alternatives
Cohesity DataProtect, Rubrik Security Cloud, Veeam Data PlatformEight alternatives
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery, Acronis Cyber Protect, Azure Site Recovery, Cohesity DataProtect, Datto SIRIS, Druva Data Security Cloud, Rubrik Security Cloud, ZertoTwo alternatives
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery, Druva inSync / Druva Cloud PlatformNine alternatives
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery, Acronis Advanced Disaster Recovery, Arcserve UDP, Cohesity DataProtect, Commvault, Druva Data Security Cloud, Rubrik Security Cloud, Unitrends DRaaS, Veeam Data PlatformBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:44 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 12:11 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:30 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:02 | yes | 24 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:51 | yes | 18 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:24 | yes | 14 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:21 | yes | 23 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:46 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:02 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:44 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:40 | yes | 24 | 95 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:06 | yes | 9 | 61 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 07:52 | yes | 4 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:30 | yes | 15 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:30 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:39 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:22 | yes | 14 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:33 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:49 | yes | 22 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:30 | yes | 12 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:58 | yes | 24 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:47 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:34 | yes | 15 | 76 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 12:25 | yes | 19 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 13:16 | yes | 14 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:02 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 13:09 | yes | 2 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:39 | yes | 12 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:29 | yes | 15 | 11 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:16 | yes | 4 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 12:43 | yes | 20 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:34 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 12:46 | yes | 21 | 13 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:36 | yes | 11 | 10 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:29 | yes | 24 | 50 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:42 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:41 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 12:04 | yes | 20 | 41 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:59 | yes | 25 | 37 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 12:55 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 12:40 | yes | 10 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:33 | yes | 14 | 36 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:15 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:48 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:04 | yes | 13 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:41 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 12:31 | yes | 20 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:02 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:01 | yes | 25 | 50 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:45 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:41 | yes | 24 | 230 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:53 | yes | 25 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:13 | yes | 21 | 45 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 13:50 | yes | 19 | 88 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:28 | yes | 3 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 13:23 | yes | 20 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:10 | yes | 36 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 12:36 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:42 | yes | 10 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:33 | yes | 18 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:55 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:30 | no | 0 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:55 | yes | 25 | 51 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 13:25 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:00 | yes | 10 | 54 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:22 | yes | 25 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:45 | yes | 25 | 49 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 12:43 | yes | 9 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:26 | yes | 3 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:00 | yes | 15 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 13:08 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:43 | yes | 2 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:32 | yes | 7 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:32 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:45 | yes | 23 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:21 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:05 | yes | 23 | 55 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:16 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:30 | yes | 10 | 37 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:01 | yes | 25 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:16 | yes | 24 | 47 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:40 | yes | 10 | 80 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:59 | yes | 4 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 13:01 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Acronis read as Acronis Cyber Protect
Arcserve read as Arcserve UDP
Axcient read as Axcient x360Recover
Carbonite (for small business) read as Carbonite Safe
Cohesity read as Cohesity DataProtect
Cohesity Data Cloud read as Cohesity DataProtect
Datto read as Datto SIRIS
Dell Technologies PowerProtect read as Dell PowerProtect
Druva read as Druva Data Security Cloud
Druva (Resilience Cloud) read as Druva Data Security Cloud
Druva Resilience Cloud read as Druva Data Security Cloud
Google Cloud Backup read as Google Cloud Backup and DR Service
HYCU read as HYCU R-Cloud
MSP360 read as MSP360 Managed Backup
Rubrik read as Rubrik Security Cloud
Veeam read as Veeam Data Platform
Veritas read as Veritas Alta Data Protection
Veritas (NetBackup) read as Veritas Alta Data Protection
Veritas Technologies read as Veritas Alta Data Protection
Unresolved, counted raw
Acronis International GmbH
Alcion
Backup Exec
BairesDev
Cohesity, Inc.
Commvault Cloud SaaS
Commvault Cloud Security
Commvault Complete
Commvault Systems, Inc.
Dataprise's Backup and Disaster Recovery as a Service (BDRaaS)
Druva inSync / Druva Cloud Platform
Eon.io
GitProtect
GitProtect.io
Google Drive personal plans
Hewlett Packard Enterprise HPE Zerto
IBM Cloud Resiliency Orchestration
IBM Corporation
Microsoft Corporation Azure Backup & Recovery Services
MozyHome
N2WS
OpenText Corporation
Rubrik Enterprise Edition
Rubrik, Inc.
Skyfalke Cloud
Spin RYU
Storware
Symantec NetBackup
TechRepublic
TierPoint's Data Protection and Disaster Recovery Services
Unitrends DRaaS
VMware Disaster Recovery
Veeam Software
g-Backup Infinite
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.