Index › Products › Wave · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Wave

10Judge labels

1First choices

1Negative labels

9 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Wave was named 3 times in IT financial mgmt, where Nicus ITFM Platform led with 9%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business15 of 162

under the label threshold

Mid-market48 of 159

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In it financial mgmt · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Wave for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
IT financial management	IT operations and endpoint	0%	48 of 159	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Nicus ITFM Platform at 9%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Wave yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Wave across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative3 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“$0 for basics (invoicing, tracking, reports)... Use for IT budgeting if not cloud-intensive” Grok 4.1 Fast · IT financial mgmt · budget prompt · alternative

“Zoho Books (or Wave if you need 100% free)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · IT financial mgmt · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Wave, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Wave was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Zoho Books7 of 101Not among the top eight

QuickBooks Online6 of 101Not among the top eight

Xero6 of 100Not among the top eight

Ramp4 of 101Not among the top eight

FreshBooks4 of 100Not among the top eight

QuickBooks3 of 101Not among the top eight

Flexera One3 of 100Not among the top eight

IBM Apptio3 of 100Not among the top eight

IBM Apptio Cloudability3 of 100Not among the top eight

Brex2 of 100Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Wave. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 10 answers that named Wave and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

qobra.co7

ramp.com6

thectoclub.com5

devopsschool.com4

forbes.com4

sage.com4

softwareadvice.com4

au.pcmag.com3

business.com3

business.org3

No domain is on file for Wave, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

qobra.co/blog/best-financial-management-software6

ramp.com/blog/finance-as-a-service-faas-top-tools-for-modern-finance-teams6

devopsschool.com/blog/top-10-it-financial-management-tools-features-pros-cons-comparison4

thectoclub.com/tools/best-it-financial-management-software4

au.pcmag.com/smb-accounting/108890/the-best-budget-friendly-accounting-software-for-small-3

business.com/categories/accounting-software3

rippling.com/blog/financial-management-tools3

use.expensify.com/resource-center/guides/financial-management-tools3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Wave stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 368,000 a month (“wave”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 253,218 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 48 of 159 in IT financial mgmt

Segment leader

Nicus ITFM Platform

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 10 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Wave

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Wave's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Wave, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Wave by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Wave is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Wave, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.