| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise architecture tools | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 113 of 113 | 83% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by SAP LeanIX at 25% | |
| Video conferencing | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 27 of 50 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Zoom Workplace at 42% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“They are transitioning entirely to a homegrown sovereign platform called Visio to protect state communication.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Video conferencing · negative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Spreadsheet/diagram-only setups for enterprise-wide EA work. Excel, PowerPoint, and Visio are useful for small projects” Perplexity Sonar · EA tools · negative prompt · hard negative
“you should strictly avoid using these tools as your primary repository” Qwen 3.7 Flash · EA tools · negative prompt · hard negative
“Never try to build or scale a permanent EA practice on these.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · EA tools · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid: ... standalone diagramming tools (Excel/Visio)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · EA tools · negative prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 17 answers that named Visio and are not a share of its labels.
No domain is on file for Visio, so its own site is not marked.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Visio's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Visio, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Visio by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: