Every category where a model named MEGA HOPEX for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Enterprise architecture tools	IT operations and endpoint	0%	85 of 113	42%	12	criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for MEGA HOPEX yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated MEGA HOPEX across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	2	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	2	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	1	0	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labels1

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative12 labelsNone

Budget-constrained6 labels1

Scale-constrained9 labelsNone

Negative14 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative52 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“offers a unified platform for both business and IT management with flexible deployment options” Claude Haiku 4.5 · EA tools · comparative prompt · alternative

“Choose MEGA HOPEX if you need integrated governance, risk, and compliance alongside EA” Kimi K2 · EA tools · comparative prompt · alternative

“For companies with complex regulatory environments, MEGA HOPEX may be the best fit.” Mistral Small · EA tools · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“heavyweights like MEGA HOPEX and Alfabet ... notoriously steep learning curve, require specialized training” Gemini 3.5 Flash · EA tools · negative prompt · soft negative

“Avoid unless you're a large, highly regulated organization with dedicated EA resources.” Kimi K2 · EA tools · negative prompt · soft negative

“like Software AG Alfabet or MEGA HOPEX, which are often overkill and too costly” Gemini 3.5 Flash · EA tools · direct prompt · soft negative

“significantly cheaper than giants like MEGA HOPEX or BiZZdesign” Qwen 3.7 Flash · EA tools · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as MEGA HOPEX, over the 52 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MEGA HOPEX was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Ardoq38 of 5210Not among the top eight

SAP LeanIX31 of 5211Not among the top eight

Bizzdesign Horizzon27 of 520Not among the top eight

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect23 of 525Not among the top eight

LeanIX17 of 525Not among the top eight

Avolution ABACUS14 of 521Not among the top eight

Software AG Alfabet12 of 520Not among the top eight

Archi11 of 523Not among the top eight

OrbusInfinity10 of 520Not among the top eight

Bizzdesign Enterprise Studio9 of 520Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MEGA HOPEX. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 49 of the 52 answers that named MEGA HOPEX and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

superblocks.com32

erstudio.com30

catio.tech24

leanix.net24

ardoq.com23

capstera.com19

cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com19

research.oz.spotlightar.com19

itechguides.com18

thectoclub.com18

226 of the 226 domain citations in answers naming MEGA HOPEX came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

superblocks.com/blog/enterprise-architecture-tools32

erstudio.com/blog/enterprise-architecture-tools30

catio.tech/blog/enterprise-architecture-tools24

cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com/tools/10-best-enterprise-arch/13170569419

capstera.com/knowledge-hub/articles/enterprise-architecture-tools-guide18

research.oz.spotlightar.com/reports/magic-quadrant-enterprise-architecture-tools-2024/lead18

thectoclub.com/tools/best-enterprise-architecture-software18

archiq.app/enterprise-architecture-tools16

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

mega.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, MEGA HOPEX takes 0% of first choices and SAP LeanIX takes 25%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “enterprise architecture tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “enterprise architecture tools”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 70 a month (“mega hopex”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 1 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 1,674 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 351 · 1 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 2,369
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 85 of 113 in EA tools

Segment leader

25%

SAP LeanIX

First choices: 2 across its categories
Named in: 52 answers
Its own site cited: in 49 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on mega.com

265

subdomains included

Content

224

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 1

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	101	9	2026-09-11	APM, GRC
Case study	58	undated		GRC
Report or ebook	28	1	2026-08-11	EA tools
News or press	22	undated
Glossary or explainer	12	0	2025-09-22
Comparison	3	0	2025-09-27

Most recent

2026-09-11What digital twin organization blog
2026-09-11Who benefits from digital twin organization blog
2026-09-07Fedramp certified bizzdesign govcloud portfolio management blog
2026-09-03Why model context protocol suddenly everywhere enterprise ai blog
2026-08-31Why archimate 4 puts simplicity first blog
2026-08-28The history and future of archimate blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page mega.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as MEGA HOPEX

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as MEGA HOPEX; a claim can dispute any of them.

Mega HOPEX 2

Follow MEGA HOPEX

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

MEGA HOPEX is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Optimize and Reinforce Your Operations
mega.com
Not stated on the pages read: Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What MEGA HOPEX's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: mega.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MEGA HOPEX's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MEGA HOPEX, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for MEGA HOPEX by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where MEGA HOPEX is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name MEGA HOPEX, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.