AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Venafi/CyberArk · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Venafi/CyberArk

2Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Venafi/CyberArk was named 1 time in Certificate management, where Sectigo Certificate Manager led with 27%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In certificate management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Venafi/CyberArk for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Certificate lifecycle managementIdentity and access0%40 of 1040%1under 10 labels · led by Sectigo Certificate Manager at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Venafi/CyberArk yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Venafi/CyberArk across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B10001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 label1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Widely considered the gold standard for enterprise machine identity... though it comes with a premium enterprise price tag.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Certificate management · negative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Venafi/CyberArk, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Venafi/CyberArk was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
AppViewX CERT+2 of 20Not among the top eight
DigiCert Trust Lifecycle Manager2 of 20Not among the top eight
Keyfactor2 of 20Not among the top eight
AWS Certificate Manager1 of 20Not among the top eight
Certify The Web1 of 20Not among the top eight
DigiCert1 of 20Not among the top eight
Entrust Certificate Manager1 of 20Not among the top eight
GlobalSign1 of 20Not among the top eight
GlobalSign Atlas1 of 20Not among the top eight
Keyfactor Command1 of 20Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Venafi/CyberArk. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named Venafi/CyberArk and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

digicert.com2
itechguides.com2
worldmetrics.org2
assets.applytosupply.digitalmarketplace.service.gov.uk1
axelspire.com1
businesswire.com1
cdn.venafi.comYour site1
csoonline.com1
cyberpress.org1
devopsschool.com1

Twelve of the thirteen domain citations in answers naming Venafi/CyberArk came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

venafi.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Venafi/CyberArk takes 0% of first choices and Sectigo Certificate Manager takes 27%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “certificate lifecycle management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “certificate lifecycle management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Organic visits to its site
about 7,407 a month
Searches its site ranks for
759 · 55 in the top three
Sites linking to it
3,525
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 40 of 104 in certificate management
Segment leader
27%
Sectigo Certificate Manager
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
2 answers
Its own site cited
in 2 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on venafi.com
9,710
subdomains included
Content
8,666
counted in the table below
Documentation
21
Product · Integration
13 · 3
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog4,806272026-10-01XDR, SASE
Report or ebook1,87902023-05-01SASE, XDR
Podcast or video53402015-08-01SASE, XDR
News or press40802018-12-01SASE, Firewalls
Glossary or explainer36102024-01-01SD-WAN, EDR
Case study35302007-07-16SASE, MDR
Conference or event11302023-07-01SASE
Comparison9802023-03-01SASE, XDR
Webinar or virtual event9302021-01-01Firewalls, SOAR
Template or tool2102019-06-01
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page venafi.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SASE (184); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Venafi/CyberArk

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Venafi/CyberArk; a claim can dispute any of them.
Venafi [CyberArk] 1

Follow Venafi/CyberArk

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Venafi/CyberArk is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Next-Generation Trust Security (NGTS) brings certificate lifecycle management, PKI and certificate automation together.
For
organizations
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What Venafi/CyberArk's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: venafi.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Venafi/CyberArk's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Venafi/CyberArk, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Venafi/CyberArk by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Venafi/CyberArk is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Venafi/CyberArk, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at venafi.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.