AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › SushiSwap · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

SushiSwap

28Judge labels
0First choices
9Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in DEX for mid-market buyers
Rank 52 of 219 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 36% of its 14 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of SushiSwap →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In dex · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SushiSwap for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Digital employee experienceIT operations and endpoint0%52 of 21936%14criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SushiSwap yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SushiSwap across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00101
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small11002
DeepSeek V4 Flash00112
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200202
GLM 4.7 FlashX00011
MiniMax M2.501023
GPT-6 Luna00011
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative12 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative10 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative28 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Stick to well-known, audited DEXs like Uniswap, dYdX, or SushiSwap” Mistral Small · DEX · negative prompt · first choice
“SushiSwap is also commonly listed for dollar-cost averaging and multi-chain support” Perplexity Sonar · DEX · budget prompt · alternative
“For community-driven ecosystem: SushiSwap” MiniMax M2.5 · DEX · comparative prompt · alternative
“SushiSwap for multi-chain flexibility” Mistral Small · DEX · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“The 2020 incident was a classic "chef Nomi" exit-scam” MiniMax M2.5 · DEX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Its team documented a RouteProcessor2 exploit in April 2023 involving token approvals... The incident alone doesn’t show that Sushi’s current contracts are compromised.” GPT-6 Luna · DEX · negative prompt · soft negative
“its history of security incidents and codebase complexities make it worth additional scrutiny” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DEX · negative prompt · soft negative
“Various exploits (2023–2024), ranging from ~$1.8M to $11M in losses.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · DEX · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SushiSwap, over the 28 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SushiSwap was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Uniswap22 of 2812Not among the top eight
PancakeSwap21 of 288Not among the top eight
Curve Finance16 of 280Not among the top eight
Balancer10 of 280Not among the top eight
1inch9 of 283Not among the top eight
dYdX9 of 280Not among the top eight
Raydium6 of 281Not among the top eight
Hyperliquid5 of 280Not among the top eight
Uniswap v34 of 282Not among the top eight
Curve4 of 280Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SushiSwap. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 28 answers that named SushiSwap and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

Where SushiSwap stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
not counted (“sushiswap”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
7 a month
Its own site
No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 52 of 219 in DEX
Segment leader
13%
ControlUp
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
28 answers
Its own site cited
No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow SushiSwap

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SushiSwap's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SushiSwap, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SushiSwap by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where SushiSwap is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name SushiSwap, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.