AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Stedi · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Stedi

12Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Stedi was named 5 times in EDI, where TrueCommerce EDI led with 32%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In edi · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Stedi for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
EDI platformsData platform2%7 of 930%5under 10 labels · led by TrueCommerce EDI at 32%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Stedi yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Stedi across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B10001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 label1
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Modern cloud-native EDI with transparent, usage-based pricing and no traditional per-connection fees.” Muse Glimmer 30B · EDI · budget prompt · first choice
“Choose Stedi if your team prefers API-first, engineering-driven customization.” Perplexity Sonar · EDI · comparative prompt · alternative
“Consider Orderful or Stedi for more control and flexibility.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · EDI · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“A developer-first, serverless EDI infrastructure platform.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · EDI · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Stedi, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Stedi was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Orderful9 of 124Not among the top eight
TrueCommerce EDI9 of 123Not among the top eight
Cleo Integration Cloud8 of 123Not among the top eight
SPS Commerce6 of 123Not among the top eight
Elevate5 of 121Not among the top eight
OpenText Trading Grid5 of 120Not among the top eight
Boomi B2B/EDI Management3 of 120Not among the top eight
IBM Sterling3 of 120Not among the top eight
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator2 of 121Not among the top eight
Celigo Integrator.io2 of 120Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Stedi. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 12 answers that named Stedi and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com10
cleo.com9
orderful.com9
capterra.com7
learn.g2.com6
softwareadvice.com6
jitterbit.com5
sftptogo.com5
softwareconnect.com5
sourceforge.net4

No domain is on file for Stedi, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Stedi stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
4,400 a month (“stedi”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
749 a month
Its own site
No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 7 of 93 in EDI
Segment leader
32%
TrueCommerce EDI
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
12 answers
Its own site cited
No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Stedi

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Stedi's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Stedi, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Stedi by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Stedi is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Stedi, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.