OpenText · 1 category · RankedOpenText Trading Grid
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDI platforms | Data platform | 0% | 93 of 93 | 55% | 11 | criticized challenger |
Movement
By model
How each model treated OpenText Trading Grid across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose IBM Sterling or OpenText if you're a larger enterprise with complex legacy B2B needs.” GPT-5.4 mini · EDI · comparative prompt · alternative
“especially relevant when global reach and multiple integration patterns matter” GPT-6 Luna · EDI · comparative prompt · alternative
“Tier 1 enterprise platform alongside Cleo, IBM Sterling and Boomi” Muse Glimmer 30B · EDI · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“OpenText is notoriously poor for Small and Medium Businesses (SMBs). Their systems are highly complex, contracts are rigid, setup costs are astronomical” Gemini 3.5 Flash · EDI · negative prompt · soft negative
“OpenText and traditional systems tend to have higher overall costs and are more complex than modern cloud EDI systems” Claude Haiku 4.5 · EDI · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Enterprise-scale but dated UI; suited for established firms, slower mod vs. cloud natives.” Grok 4.1 Fast · EDI · comparative prompt · soft negative
“they require highly specialized, expensive EDI consultants to configure and maintain” Gemini 3.5 Flash · EDI · comparative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as OpenText Trading Grid, over the 56 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OpenText Trading Grid was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 55 of the 56 answers that named OpenText Trading Grid and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
232 of the 232 domain citations in answers naming OpenText Trading Grid came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where OpenText Trading Grid stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 50 a month (“opentext trading grid”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 2 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on OpenText's site (opentext.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 56 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 55 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as OpenText Trading Grid
Follow OpenText Trading Grid
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
OpenText is the company behind OpenText Trading Grid.ShowHide
The company
On record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Unlock AI-powered knowledge, insights, and guided action across your supply chain
- Not stated on the pages read
- Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What OpenText Trading Grid's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: opentext.com, opentext.com/products/fax, opentext.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OpenText Trading Grid's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OpenText Trading Grid, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for OpenText Trading Grid by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where OpenText Trading Grid is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name OpenText Trading Grid, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.