Every category where a model named Orderful for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
EDI platforms	Data platform	6%	4 of 93	0%	39	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Orderful yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Orderful across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	3	0	5
Perplexity Sonar	0	2	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	1	3
Mistral Small	0	2	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	1	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	0	2
Kimi K2	0	1	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	1	2	5
MiniMax M2.5	1	3	0	4
GPT-6 Luna	1	3	0	4
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	2	1	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct22 labels10

Paraphrase15 labels4

Comparative21 labels6not counted in share

Budget-constrained27 labels16

Scale-constrained18 labels1

Negative10 labels6not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative113 labels in all, every segment counted; 31 of the 43 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For most small businesses, a cloud‑based SaaS with flat‑rate pricing (e.g., Orderful, EDIGenerator, ActionEDI) offers the best balance of affordability, ease of use, and support.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · EDI · budget prompt · first choice

“API-First EDI Platforms (e.g., Orderful, Cleo, Celigo): These platforms allow your developers to write modern code and view API logs instantly.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · EDI · negative prompt · first choice

“If you want a modern web platform with zero setup fees and flat, highly predictable monthly costs, go with Orderful.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · EDI · budget prompt · first choice

“For a small company with a tight budget and only a few trading partners, I'd start by evaluating Orderful's Web EDI.” GPT-6 Luna · EDI · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Orderful, over the 113 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Orderful was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

TrueCommerce EDI85 of 11313Compare →

Cleo Integration Cloud71 of 11319Compare →

SPS Commerce71 of 11310Compare →

Celigo Integrator.io30 of 1130Not among the top eight

Boomi B2B/EDI Management24 of 1131Not among the top eight

OpenText Trading Grid24 of 1130Not among the top eight

Elevate18 of 1133Not among the top eight

eZCom13 of 1134Not among the top eight

IBM Sterling B2B Integrator12 of 1133Not among the top eight

IBM Sterling12 of 1131Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Orderful. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 112 of the 113 answers that named Orderful and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

orderful.comYour site85

cleo.com78

g2.com64

jitterbit.com58

learn.g2.com57

capterra.com51

softwareadvice.com37

sourceforge.net36

softwareconnect.com33

truecommerce.com33

447 of the 532 domain citations in answers naming Orderful came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-edi-software57

jitterbit.com/blog/best-edi-platforms56

cleo.com/blog/best-edi-solution-providers37

capterra.com/resources/best-edi-software-ease-of-use-smbs36

g2.com/categories/electronic-data-interchange-edi36

orderful.com/blog/best-edi-providers-small-businesses-202636

softwareconnect.com/roundups/best-edi-software-providers30

orderful.com/blog/edi-solutions-for-small-businesses28

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

orderful.com ranks 9 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Orderful takes 6% of first choices and TrueCommerce EDI takes 32%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “edi platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “edi platforms”

Searches for its name, Google: 1,300 a month (“orderful”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 2,217,331 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 38,857 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 5,051 · 103 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,135
Paid Google search: 2 searches its ads show for, about 41 clicks and $4,233 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

120+ ads · 109 text, 8 video, 3 image · 120 shown in the last 30 days

First shown March 2024, as Orderful, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 43 in the year, 77 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 4 of 93 in EDI

Segment leader

32%

TrueCommerce EDI

First choices: 31 across its categories
Named in: 113 answers
Its own site cited: in 112 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on orderful.com

2,085

subdomains included

Content

360

counted in the table below

Documentation

439

Product · Integration

10 · 1

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	238	7	2026-10-02	EDI
Glossary or explainer	45	0	2026-01-07	EDI, MFT
Case study	25	1	2026-07-07	EDI
Comparison	16	0	2026-06-15	EDI
News or press	14	1	2026-08-11	EDI
Report or ebook	9	0	2025-03-10	EDI
Webinar or virtual event	8	0	2025-01-22	EDI
Template or tool	3	0	2026-03-04	EDI
Conference or event	2	undated

Most recent

2026-10-02Ai edi roi blog
2026-09-30Ai edi exception handling blog
2026-09-18Best edi platforms apparel fashion brands blog
2026-09-01Grocery edi cpg brands blog
2026-08-20Why edi costs more than it should blog
2026-08-12Common edi error codes and how to fix them blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page orderful.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Orderful

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Orderful; a claim can dispute any of them.

Orderful (Mosaic) 1Orderful (Web EDI / Pixel) 1

Follow Orderful

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Orderful is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Modern EDI Platform - Bringing Supply Chains Together
orderful.com
For: teams of every size, from small businesses using Web EDI to global enterprises standardizing on an API-powered workflow
orderful.com
Price stated: Pricing orderful.com/pricing
Starting price: Starting at $99/month orderful.com/pricing
Free plan or trial: Create a Free Account orderful.com/product/pixel
Integrations claimed: 10000 orderful.com/product/pixel
Certifications: SOC2 ComplianceSOC 2
Hosting: USA & GermanyUSA & EU
Customers named: Liquid DeathNFIKBX Technology SolutionsGrosfillex North AmericaHeartland Logistics GroupHome DepotCarawayEmerge

What Orderful's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: orderful.com, orderful.com/pricing, trust.orderful.com, orderful.com/product/pixel, orderful.com/resources/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Orderful's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Orderful, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Orderful by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Orderful is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Orderful, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.