| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDI platforms | Data platform | 0% | 75 of 93 | 50% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by TrueCommerce EDI at 32% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“IBM Sterling (praised for reliability, broad capabilities, good support)” Grok 4.1 Fast · EDI · negative prompt · first choice
“Consider it where enterprise requirements and existing IBM or legacy infrastructure are important” GPT-6 Luna · EDI · comparative prompt · alternative
“Global enterprise with high security requirements | IBM Sterling” Kimi K2 · EDI · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“IBM Sterling offers reliable VAN-based connectivity but has slower onboarding and older architecture that can limit flexibility” Claude Haiku 4.5 · EDI · comparative prompt · soft negative
“notoriously complex and expensive to implement/maintain. It's often overkill for smaller providers.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · EDI · negative prompt · soft negative
“expensive with a steep implementation curve” GLM 4.7 FlashX · EDI · comparative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 28 of the 30 answers that named IBM Sterling and are not a share of its labels.
118 of the 118 domain citations in answers naming IBM Sterling came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What IBM Sterling's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: ibm.com/products/sterling, ibm.com/case-studies/sterling-oms-instana, ibm.com/case-studies/saint-gobain-sterling-supply-chain, developer.ibm.com/blogs/learning-about-ibm-sterling-offerings, developer.ibm.com/articles/ibm-sterling-migrating-from-giv-to-iv. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when IBM Sterling's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as IBM Sterling, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for IBM Sterling by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: