Every category where a model named SpinOne for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
SaaS security posture management	Security operations	0%	33 of 95	25%	4	under 10 labels · led by Wing Security at 30%
Backup and disaster recovery	Cloud and infrastructure	0%	93 of 116	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Veeam Data Platform at 38%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Data loss prevention	Security operations	0%	66 of 89	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Purview DLP at 46%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SpinOne yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SpinOne across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.20	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	0	2
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase7 labels1

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained7 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative5 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative26 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you want SSPM + backup fused resilience” MiniMax M2.5 · SSPM · direct prompt · alternative

“Strong Alternative: SpinOne (Spin.AI)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SSPM · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Why be cautious: If you're primarily a Microsoft 365 shop, or if backup/recovery is a big part of your use case, verify these capabilities during a PoC” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SSPM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SpinOne, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SpinOne was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Wing Security12 of 266Not among the top eight

AppOmni9 of 260Not among the top eight

SaaS Alerts7 of 263Not among the top eight

Nudge Security7 of 262Not among the top eight

Grip Security6 of 261Not among the top eight

CrowdStrike Falcon Shield5 of 260Not among the top eight

8200.dev4 of 262Not among the top eight

Microsoft Secure Score4 of 261Not among the top eight

Obsidian4 of 260Not among the top eight

Adaptive Shield3 of 260Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SpinOne. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 26 answers that named SpinOne and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com18

cyberpress.org17

gbhackers.com14

us.fitgap.com14

startupstash.com12

itechguides.com11

work-management.org11

scmgalaxy.com10

sourceforge.net9

cybersecuritynews.com8

124 of the 124 domain citations in answers naming SpinOne came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cyberpress.org/sspm-tools-by-business-size-216

us.fitgap.com/search/saas-security-posture-management-sspm-solutions/small-business14

startupstash.com/best-sspm-platforms11

work-management.org/network-security/sspm-tools-small-businesses11

gbhackers.com/best-sspm-compared10

itechguides.com/best/saas-security-posture-management-software10

scmgalaxy.com/tutorials/top-10-saas-security-posture-management-sspm-features-pros-cons-co10

g2.com/categories/saas-security-posture-management-sspm-solutions/small-business9

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

spin.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SpinOne takes 0% of first choices and Wing Security takes 30%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “sspm platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “sspm platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 1,300 a month (“spinone”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 455 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 8,188 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 4,304 · 99 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 2,545
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

4 ads · 4 text · 1 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2025, as Spin Technology, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 2 in the year, 2 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 33 of 95 in SSPM

Segment leader

30%

Wing Security

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 26 answers
Its own site cited: in 25 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on spin.ai

825

subdomains included

Content

728

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

49 · 5

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Categories named
Blog	595	undated	DLP, SSPM
News or press	45	undated	SSPM, DLP
Comparison	31	undated	SSPM, CSPM
Glossary or explainer	16	undated	DSPM, CSPM
Template or tool	15	undated	SSPM
Case study	13	undated
Webinar or virtual event	6	undated
Conference or event	4	undated
Report or ebook	3	undated

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page spin.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as SpinOne

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SpinOne; a claim can dispute any of them.

SpinOne (Spin.AI) 2

Follow SpinOne

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

SpinOne is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: All-in-one SaaS security and data protection
spin.ai
For: cloud-first, midmarket and large enterprise organizations and MSPs
spin.ai
Price stated: per user with tiers for backup, ransomware response, SSPM, DSPM, DLP, and browser security, bundled for cost efficiency by SpinOne spin.ai/pricing
Starting price: 3 spin.ai/pricing
Free plan or trial: Get Free Trial; No credit card required spin.ai
Integrations claimed: 50 spin.ai
Certifications: SOC 2 Type IIHIPAAGDPRPCI DSSData Privacy FrameworkCSACSA STARSpinOne CSA STAR Level 1 Certification
Hosting: AWSGCPAzure
Customers named: TeadsBeLongTailSt. Stephen’s Episcopal School

What SpinOne's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: spin.ai, spin.ai/pricing, trust.spin.ai, spin.ai/platform/dlp. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SpinOne's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SpinOne, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SpinOne by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where SpinOne is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name SpinOne, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.