| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Network monitoring and management | Network and edge | 0% | 78 of 78 | 88% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Auvik at 26% | |
| Infrastructure monitoring | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 78 of 79 | 100% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Datadog at 28% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Patch management | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 81 of 85 | 100% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus at 29% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Remote monitoring and management | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 52 of 62 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by NinjaOne at 47% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“many organizations are moving away from it for network / infrastructure monitoring because of the lingering trust issue and cost model” Muse Glimmer 30B · Infra monitoring · negative prompt · hard negative
“The 2020 compromise of SolarWinds Orion demonstrated how a patch management and remote monitoring tool can be weaponized” Mistral Small · Patching · negative prompt · hard negative
“The 2020 supply-chain breach exposed major vulnerabilities ... Avoid if: Security-sensitive environments” Grok 4.20 · Infra monitoring · negative prompt · hard negative
“The 2020 SUNBURST attack made this the most infamous example of monitoring tool risk.” Kimi K2 · Infra monitoring · negative prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 22 answers that named SolarWinds Orion and are not a share of its labels.
Fifty-one of the fifty-nine domain citations in answers naming SolarWinds Orion came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SolarWinds Orion's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SolarWinds Orion, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SolarWinds Orion by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: