Every category where a model named Sifflet for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Data quality and observability	Data platform	2%	13 of 110	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Metaplane at 31%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Sifflet yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Sifflet across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labels1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labels1

Scale-constrained4 labels1

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd suggest short-listing Monte Carlo and Sifflet for demos” MiniMax M2.5 · Data observability · scale prompt · first choice

“Better alternatives: Lightweight, targeted observability tools (like Metaplane or Sifflet)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Data observability · negative prompt · alternative

“Best for: Teams needing business context in alerts” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Data observability · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Sifflet, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sifflet was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Monte Carlo21 of 2212Not among the top eight

Acceldata16 of 223Not among the top eight

Bigeye15 of 223Not among the top eight

Anomalo14 of 220Not among the top eight

Soda12 of 220Not among the top eight

Datadog9 of 221Not among the top eight

Metaplane9 of 220Not among the top eight

Great Expectations7 of 221Not among the top eight

DQLabs7 of 220Not among the top eight

Atlan6 of 221Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sifflet. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 22 answers that named Sifflet and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

atlan.com15

research.isg-one.com14

datamation.com11

gartner.com11

siffletdata.comYour site11

research.oz.spotlightar.com9

guideflow.com8

acceldata.io7

dqlabs.ai7

motadata.com7

Eighty-nine of the 100 domain citations in answers naming Sifflet came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

research.isg-one.com/buyers-guide/analytics_and_data/data_observability/202414

atlan.com/know/data-observability-tools13

datamation.com/big-data/data-observability-tools11

gartner.com/reviews/market/data-observability-tools11

siffletdata.com/blog/top-data-observability-platform8

guideflow.com/blog/data-observability-software7

motadata.com/blog/observability-tools7

research.oz.spotlightar.com/reports/magic-quadrant-observability-platforms-2024/leaders7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

siffletdata.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Sifflet takes 2% of first choices and Metaplane takes 31%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “data observability platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best data observability platform”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 320 a month (“sifflet”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 4 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 921 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 515 · 5 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 768
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

18 ads · 18 text · 1 shown in the last 30 days

First shown March 2025, as Sifflet, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 7 in the year, 11 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 13 of 110 in data observability

Segment leader

31%

Metaplane

First choices: 3 across its categories
Named in: 22 answers
Its own site cited: in 22 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on siffletdata.com

949

subdomains included

Content

279

counted in the table below

Documentation

534

Product · Integration

1 · 34

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	197	undated		Data catalogs, Observability
Webinar or virtual event	46	0	2026-02-11
Case study	14	undated
Comparison	13	undated		ETL
Conference or event	5	undated
Template or tool	3	undated
Podcast or video	1	undated

Most recent

2026-02-112026 data trends everything you need to know webinar or virtual event
2026-02-10Ai agents for data observability webinar or virtual event
2026-01-27Data observability in action sifflet for snowflake webinar or virtual event

Events in person

Last twelve months

reported March 2026Gartner Data & Analytics SummitOrlando · attended

As the event pages on siffletdata.com state them, read October 5, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page siffletdata.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Sifflet

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Sifflet is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: The Control Plane for Data and AI
siffletdata.com
For: data leaders, engineers, and platform teams
siffletdata.com
Price stated: Free 14-day trial available. Paid plans available for teams and enterprises. siffletdata.com
Starting price: 0 siffletdata.com
Free plan or trial: Free 14-day trial available. siffletdata.com
Certifications: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certificate
Hosting: Customer's choice (EU or US)Europe (UK)EU (Ireland)US
Customers named: Penguin Random HouseSaint-GobainEuronextCarrefour LinksHypebeastThe AdaptavistEtamBBC Studios
Not stated on the pages read: Integrations

What Sifflet's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: siffletdata.com, siffletdata.com/pricing, trust.siffletdata.com, siffletdata.com/product/integrations, siffletdata.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sifflet's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sifflet, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Sifflet by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Sifflet is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Sifflet, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.