IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Shodan · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Shodan

9Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
7 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Shodan was named 1 time in ASM, where Intruder led with 59%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In asm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Shodan for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Attack surface managementSecurity operations0%56 of 1040%1under 10 labels · led by Intruder at 59%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Shodan yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Shodan across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Shodan Monitor: Starts around $69/month.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ASM · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Shodan, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Shodan was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Censys ASM6 of 92Not in the top three
Intruder4 of 93Not in the top three
Detectify3 of 90Not in the top three
Cortex Xpanse2 of 91Not in the top three
bspeka2 of 91Not in the top three
Bitsight2 of 90Not in the top three
CyCognito2 of 90Not in the top three
OWASP Amass2 of 90Not in the top three
SecurityScorecard2 of 90Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Shodan. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 9 answers that named Shodan and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

attaxion.com3
cyberbench.net3
g2.com3
sourceforge.net3
attacksurfacescan.com2
blog.detectify.com2
bspeka.com2
circleid.com2
esecurityplanet.com2
heimdalsecurity.com2

Twenty-four of the twenty-four domain citations in answers naming Shodan came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Shodan

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Shodan; a claim can dispute any of them.
Shodan Monitor 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Shodan's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Shodan, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at shodan.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.