AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Secureworks Taegis ManagedXDR · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Secureworks Taegis ManagedXDR

14Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Secureworks Taegis ManagedXDR was named 5 times in MDR, where Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response led with 37%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In mdr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Secureworks Taegis ManagedXDR for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Managed detection and responseSecurity operations0%14 of 670%5under 10 labels · led by Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response at 37%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Secureworks Taegis ManagedXDR held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · MDR · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 39 → 28 of 42
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 39 → 14 of 65
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 20 → 17 of 60

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
MDR0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 39 → 14 of 67

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Secureworks Taegis ManagedXDR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000101
Mistral Small01102
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Praised for a balanced "human-plus-machine" approach and ranked high for analyst response quality.” Mistral Small · MDR · comparative prompt · alternative
“### 3. SecureWorks (Best for Traditional Corporate Structures)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · MDR · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Secureworks Taegis ManagedXDR, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Secureworks Taegis ManagedXDR was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response10 of 142Not among the top eight
SentinelOne Singularity MDR8 of 140Not among the top eight
CrowdStrike Falcon Complete6 of 143Not among the top eight
Rapid7 MDR6 of 140Not among the top eight
Sophos MDR5 of 141Not among the top eight
Expel MDR5 of 140Not among the top eight
Huntress Managed EDR4 of 141Not among the top eight
Cynet 3604 of 140Not among the top eight
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR MDR4 of 140Not among the top eight
CrowdStrike3 of 142Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Secureworks Taegis ManagedXDR. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 14 answers that named Secureworks Taegis ManagedXDR and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

intezer.com7
huntress.com6
mdrproviders.io6
cynet.com5
gartner.com4
paloaltonetworks.com4
crowdstrike.com3
decryptiondigest.com3
eset.com3
expel.com3

Forty-four of the forty-four domain citations in answers naming Secureworks Taegis ManagedXDR came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

secureworks.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Secureworks Taegis ManagedXDR takes 0% of first choices and Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response takes 37%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “mdr service”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “mdr services”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
not counted (“secureworks taegis managedxdr”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
0 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 3,450 a month
Searches its site ranks for
371 · 27 in the top three
Sites linking to it
7,005
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 14 of 67 in MDR
Segment leader
37%
Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
14 answers
Its own site cited
in 10 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on secureworks.com
9,298
subdomains included
Content
2,843
counted in the table below
Documentation
15
Product · Integration
223 · 265
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog2,50862026-09-11MDR, XDR
Report or ebook14602022-07-13MDR, Endpoint protection
Podcast or video9502021-07-05
Webinar or virtual event2902026-01-26MDR
Comparison2502024-12-30MDR, ZTNA
Glossary or explainer1712026-08-18XDR, ZTNA
Case study912026-08-11ITDR
Conference or event602025-07-09
Template or tool4undatedMDR
News or press402023-12-13

Events in person

Last twelve months
  • August 5, 2026Conference Track SessionBallroom I, Las Vegas, United States · spoke
  • August 5, 2026Sophos AfterpartyHyperX Arena, Luxor Hotel, Las Vegas, United States · hosted
  • August 4, 2026 to August 6, 2026Black Hat USA 2026Mandalay Bay, Las Vegas, United States · took part
  • August 4, 2026CISO SummitAt Four Seasons, Las Vegas, United States · spoke

As the event pages on secureworks.com state them, read October 5, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page secureworks.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Secureworks Taegis ManagedXDR

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Secureworks Taegis ManagedXDR; a claim can dispute any of them.
Secureworks 2Secureworks Taegis 2SecureWorks 1

Follow Secureworks Taegis ManagedXDR

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Secureworks Taegis ManagedXDR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Secureworks Taegis ManagedXDR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Secureworks Taegis ManagedXDR by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Secureworks Taegis ManagedXDR is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Secureworks Taegis ManagedXDR, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at secureworks.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.