3 categories · RankedReco
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SaaS security posture management | Security operations | 0% | 21 of 95 | 12% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Wing Security at 30% | |
| AI security platforms | Security operations | 0% | 46 of 233 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by SentinelOne Singularity at 11% | |
| Identity threat detection and response | Identity and access | 0% | 65 of 105 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Huntress Managed ITDR at 51% |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Reco across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Want SaaS-native identity threat detection and access risk visibility → Reco / Okta Identity Threat Protection” Muse Glimmer 30B · ITDR · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Focuses on continuously monitoring SaaS configs, access, and integrations to reduce misconfiguration risk.” Perplexity Sonar · SSPM · comparative prompt · alternative
“Reco and Palo Alto Prisma AIRS are also strong contenders depending on specific needs” Mistral Small · AI security · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“consider Grip or Reco if discovery and broader SaaS visibility are priorities” GPT-6 Luna · SSPM · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“worth evaluating if you want a broader SaaS security platform comparison, but their depth can vary by app and use case” GPT-5.4 mini · SSPM · direct prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Reco, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Reco was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 34 of the 34 answers that named Reco and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
101 of the 122 domain citations in answers naming Reco came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
reco.ai ranks 6 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Reco takes 0% of first choices and Wing Security takes 30%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 9,900 a month (“reco”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 451 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 12,799 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3,013 · 159 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,899
- Paid Google search
- 4 searches its ads show for, about 17 clicks and $1,111 a month (estimate)
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 34 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 34 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 247 | 1 | 2026-09-07 | SSPM, MFA | |
| Glossary or explainer | 70 | undated | ITDR, SSPM | ||
| Comparison | 41 | undated | SSPM, CSPM | ||
| Case study | 5 | undated | MFA | ||
| Template or tool | 5 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 4 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 1 | undated | |||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-07Exela pharma sciences leverages reco to reduce its attack surface area and manage risk blog
- 2026-01-01Bhg financial customer testimonial blog
- 2026-01-01Banco bs2 customer testimonial blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page reco.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
Names read as Reco
Follow Reco
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Reco is its own company.ShowHide
The company
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI Agent Security Platform
- For
- security teams
- Integrations claimed
- 285 reco.ai
- Certifications
- CSA STAR Level 1ISO 27001AICPA SOCEU AI ActISO 42001ISO 27001:2013SOC 2 Type IIGDPR
- Hosting
- United States/Europe (based on customer selection)Europe
- Customers named
- BelkBigIDCSKWellstar HealthExela Pharma SciencesTampa General HospitalBanco BS2BHG Financial
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial
What Reco's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: reco.ai, trust.reco.ai, reco.ai/platform, reco.ai/customers, reco.ai/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Reco's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Reco, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Reco by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Reco is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Reco, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.