AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › DoControl · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

DoControl

34Judge labels
1First choices
6Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in SSPM for enterprise buyers
Rank 20 of 95 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 8% of its 13 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of DoControl →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In sspm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named DoControl for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
SaaS security posture managementSecurity operations0%20 of 958%13accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for DoControl yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated DoControl across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini00101
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast02103
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00011
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00101
Muse Glimmer 30B01102

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative13 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 label1
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative10 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative34 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Scale automation with growing app sprawl: Adaptive Shield or DoControl.” Muse Glimmer 30B · SSPM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Focuses on data access governance and DLP.” Grok 4.1 Fast · SSPM · comparative prompt · alternative
“DoControl is inherently data-centric.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SSPM · comparative prompt · alternative
“DoControl (identity-focused)” Grok 4.1 Fast · SSPM · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Platforms to Approach with Caution Based on User Feedback ### 1. DoControl” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SSPM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as DoControl, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and DoControl was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
AppOmni27 of 3416Not among the top eight
Obsidian Security20 of 344Not among the top eight
Grip Security18 of 342Not among the top eight
Valence Security15 of 340Not among the top eight
CrowdStrike Falcon Shield14 of 344Not among the top eight
Nudge Security14 of 340Not among the top eight
Wing Security13 of 342Not among the top eight
Adaptive Shield11 of 344Not among the top eight
Zscaler SSPM9 of 340Not among the top eight
Spin.AI8 of 340Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named DoControl. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 34 of the 34 answers that named DoControl and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

docontrol.ioYour site23
startupstash.com20
cyberpress.org15
gbhackers.com15
nudgesecurity.com15
reco.ai14
scmgalaxy.com13
securityboulevard.com12
devopsschool.com11
guideflow.com11

126 of the 149 domain citations in answers naming DoControl came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

docontrol.io ranks 7 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, DoControl takes 0% of first choices and Wing Security takes 30%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “sspm platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “sspm platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
320 a month (“docontrol”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
5 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 4,611 a month
Searches its site ranks for
877 · 31 in the top three
Sites linking to it
781
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
2 ads · 2 text · 1 shown in the last 30 days

First shown July 2025, as DoControl, Inc, verified.

On Google's pages: 1 2

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 20 of 95 in SSPM
Segment leader
30%
Wing Security
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
34 answers
Its own site cited
in 34 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on docontrol.io
866
subdomains included
Content
407
counted in the table below
Documentation
361
Product · Integration
6 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog319242026-09-30DLP, SSPM
Comparison3102026-06-01SSPM, SASE
Glossary or explainer2002026-01-29DLP, ITDR
Case study19undated
Template or tool902026-05-14DLP, Insider risk
Conference or event502026-01-21
Webinar or virtual event402025-12-10
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page docontrol.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name DLP (23); 20 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow DoControl

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

DoControl is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
DoControl is a SaaS Security Platform that protects SaaS data while maintaining business productivity, automating discovery and remediation across every SaaS app.
For
organizations running SaaS - especially Google Workspace
Free plan or trial
Free Risk Assessment docontrol.io
Customers named
F300 CompanyVox MediaSisenseStackAdaptSonosEverSec Group, Inc
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting

What DoControl's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: docontrol.io, docontrol.io/use-cases/data-loss-prevention, docontrol.io/customers, docontrol.io/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when DoControl's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as DoControl, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for DoControl by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where DoControl is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name DoControl, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at docontrol.io is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.