Index › Security operations › AI SOC agents › Radiant Security vs Prophet Security

AI SOC agents · October 2026 Edition

Radiant Security vs Prophet Security

Nine of fourteen models named Radiant Security first on the direct prompt; one named Prophet Security. Radiant Security was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Prophet Security by twelve and Radiant Security carries 29 labels and Prophet Security 24, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Radiant Security

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

Prophet Security

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share24%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.

Negative rate3%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.

Rank in category#2#4A position in a field of 8; printed, not drawn.

Labels2924A count; the two differ.

The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Radiant Security reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Dropzone AI was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. Dropzone AI vs Radiant Security · Dropzone AI vs Prophet Security · Radiant Security vs SentinelOne Purple AI

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI SOC agents page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.

Radiant SecurityFirst choices, of fourteen modelsProphet Security

Direct91

Paraphrase301 against Radiant Security

Comparative02

Budget-constrained10

Scale-constrained00

Negative00

Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Radiant Security and Prophet Security were named in the same answer twenty-nine times, of the 63 answers naming Radiant Security and the 72 naming Prophet Security. In those answers Prophet Security took the first choice two times and Radiant Security three.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Radiant Security and Prophet Security stood in it.

Model	Direct	Paraphrase	Comparative	Budget-constrained	Scale-constrained	Negative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B

Radiant Security

Prophet Security

first choice

named as an alternative

argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Radiant Security on the left and Prophet Security on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Radiant Security and Prophet Security stood in it.

Both were the first choice

1 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.

Grok 4.1 FastDropzone AI, Prophet Security, Radiant Security alternatives: Arctic Wolf, Huntress Managed EDR, Microsoft Security Copilot

Radiant Security first, Prophet Security not the choice

8 of 14 modelsProphet Security was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.

Claude Haiku 4.5Radiant Security alternatives: Conifers CognitiveSOC, Dropzone AI, Stellar Cyber Open XDR

Perplexity SonarRadiant Security alternatives: Dropzone AI, Stellar Cyber Open XDR

Mistral SmallRadiant Security, SentinelOne Purple AI

DeepSeek V4 FlashRadiant Security, UnderDefense alternatives: Dropzone AI, Microsoft Security Copilot + Sentinel

Llama 4 MaverickRadiant Security alternatives: SentinelOne Purple AI

Kimi K2Radiant Security alternatives: Dropzone AI, Stellar Cyber Open XDR, UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC

GLM 4.7 FlashXRadiant Security, UnderDefense MAXI AI SOC alternatives: Dropzone AI, Microsoft Security Copilot, Torq

Muse Glimmer 30BRadiant Security, UnderDefense

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.

Gemini 3.5 FlashDropzone AI alternatives: Intezer AI SOC, Prophet Security, Radiant Security

Qwen 3.7 FlashSentinelOne Purple AI alternatives: Radiant Security

MiniMax M2.5UnderDefense MAXI AI SOC alternatives: Radiant Security

GPT-6 LunaDropzone AI alternatives: Microsoft Security Copilot, Prophet Security, Torq

Neither was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.

GPT-5.4 miniTorq AI SOC Platform alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon, Google Security Operations, Panther

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.

Small business

Prophet Security leads by two points.

Prophet Security#7 of 11

Radiant Security#9 of 11

The full small business standing →

Mid-marketThe figures above

The order flips: Radiant Security leads at mid-market.

Radiant Security#2 of 8

Prophet Security#4 of 8

The full mid-market standing →

Enterprise

The order flips: Prophet Security leads at enterprise.

Prophet Security#5 of 10

Radiant Security#– of 10

The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Radiant Security

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Radiant is likely no longer a viable standalone choice for a typical mid-sized B2B stack.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

“Best for mid-market alert overload, effectively addressing the core pain point of too many alerts and not enough analysts” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice

“Radiant Security is praised for mid-market teams looking to reduce SIEM costs and alert noise.” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice

“Start with Dropzone AI, Prophet Security, or Radiant Security if building in-house capability” Grok 4.1 Fast · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about Prophet Security

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Start with Dropzone AI, Prophet Security, or Radiant Security if building in-house capability” Grok 4.1 Fast · direct prompt · first choice

“Have a mixed tool stack and want full autonomy? Look at Prophet Security.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice

“For a mixed-vendor stack, compare Dropzone, Prophet, and Qevlar.” GPT-6 Luna · comparative prompt · first choice

Also compared

Dropzone AI vs Radiant Security Dropzone AI vs Prophet Security Radiant Security vs SentinelOne Purple AI Radiant Security vs Torq Radiant Security vs Intezer AI SOC Radiant Security vs Microsoft Security Copilot SentinelOne Purple AI vs Prophet Security Prophet Security vs Torq Prophet Security vs Intezer AI SOC Prophet Security vs Microsoft Security Copilot All twenty-one head-to-head pages and the full AI SOC agents standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.