IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

4Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management was named 1 time in ASM, where Intruder led with 59%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business84 of 96

under the label threshold

Mid-market50 of 104

under the label threshold

Enterprise35 of 78

under the label threshold

In asm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Attack surface management	Security operations	0%	50 of 104	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Intruder at 59%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Offers comprehensive vulnerability management and asset discovery, highly rated for integration and remediation.” Mistral Small · ASM · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Censys ASM3 of 40Not in the top three

Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management3 of 40Not in the top three

Cortex Xpanse2 of 41Not in the top three

CyCognito2 of 41Not in the top three

Synack2 of 41Not in the top three

Detectify2 of 40Not in the top three

IBM Randori2 of 40Not in the top three

Project Discovery1 of 41Not in the top three

Shodan1 of 41Not in the top three

Axonius1 of 40Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com2

geekflare.com2

peerspot.com2

secpod.com2

synack.com2

upguard.com2

blog.ostorlab.co1

en.wikipedia.org1

entro.security1

esecurityplanet.com1

Sixteen of the sixteen domain citations in answers naming Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

geekflare.com/cybersecurity/best-attack-surface-monitoring2

peerspot.com/categories/attack-surface-management-asm2

secpod.com/blog/top-attack-surface-management-vendors-20242

synack.com/blog/best-attack-surface-management-tools2

upguard.com/blog/best-attack-surface-management-software-solutions2

blog.ostorlab.co/best-external-attack-surface-management-platforms-2026.html1

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attack_Surface_Analyzer1

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attack_path_management1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at qualys.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.