Every category where a model named Qlik Staige for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
AI governance platforms	Data platform	2%	15 of 135	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Credo AI at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Qlik Staige yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Qlik Staige across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative2 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained9 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Strac and Qlik Staige are the top choices for small budgets” Mistral Small · AI governance · budget prompt · first choice

“If you want a lower-cost alternative with explicit SMB pricing, Qlik Staige is also highlighted as starting at $20/user/month” Perplexity Sonar · AI governance · budget prompt · alternative

“~$20/user/month for lighter governance (mentioned for SMBs).” Grok 4.1 Fast · AI governance · budget prompt · alternative

“Qlik Staige at ~ $20/user/month as a comparable” Muse Glimmer 30B · AI governance · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Qlik Staige, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Qlik Staige was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Strac15 of 1612Not among the top eight

Credo AI9 of 161Not among the top eight

OneTrust AI Governance6 of 160Not among the top eight

Lumenova AI4 of 161Not among the top eight

IBM watsonx.governance4 of 160Not among the top eight

Arize AI3 of 161Not among the top eight

Fairly AI3 of 161Not among the top eight

Holistic AI3 of 160Not among the top eight

IBM AI Fairness 3603 of 160Not among the top eight

VerifyWise2 of 161Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Qlik Staige. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 16 answers that named Qlik Staige and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

strac.io16

infomineo.com15

peoplemanagingpeople.com14

respan.ai9

dancumberlandlabs.com8

g2.com6

aiopsschool.com5

anaconda.com5

seosandwitch.com5

clickup.com4

No domain is on file for Qlik Staige, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

strac.io/blog/best-ai-governance-tools-and-software16

infomineo.com/artificial-intelligence/best-ai-governance-tools-in-2026-top-platforms-compa15

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-ai-governance-tools14

respan.ai/articles/ai-governance-tools9

dancumberlandlabs.com/blog/ai-governance-tools8

aiopsschool.com/blog/top-10-ai-governance-platforms-features-pros-cons-comparison5

anaconda.com/guides/ai-governance-platform-trust5

g2.com/categories/ai-governance-tools5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Qlik Staige stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 10 a month (“qlik staige”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 1 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 15 of 135 in AI governance

Segment leader

18%

Credo AI

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 16 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Qlik Staige

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Qlik Staige's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Qlik Staige, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Qlik Staige by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Qlik Staige is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Qlik Staige, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.