IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › OSQuery · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

OSQuery

3Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

2 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. OSQuery was named 1 time in EDR, where Bitdefender GravityZone led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market46 of 54

under the label threshold

Enterprise42 of 50

under the label threshold

In edr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named OSQuery for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Endpoint detection and response	Security operations	0%	46 of 54	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Bitdefender GravityZone at 20%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for OSQuery yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated OSQuery across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“less ideal for real-time behavioral detection” Kimi K2 · EDR · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as OSQuery, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OSQuery was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Defender for Cloud2 of 31Not in the top three

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint2 of 31Not in the top three

SentinelOne Singularity2 of 30Not in the top three

AWS Security Hub1 of 30Not in the top three

Amazon GuardDuty1 of 30Not in the top three

Avast / AVG1 of 30Not in the top three

Bitdefender GravityZone1 of 30Not in the top three

CCleaner Business1 of 30Not in the top three

CrowdStrike1 of 30Not in the top three

Datadog1 of 30Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named OSQuery. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 3 answers that named OSQuery and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

bellatorcyber.com1

blog.pascal-mietlicki.fr1

cybermarkagency.com1

cyberpress.org1

edrcost.com1

gbhackers.com1

github.com1

huntress.com1

josis365.com1

kb.griffin31.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming OSQuery came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

bellatorcyber.com/blog/edr-providers-flat-monthly-pricing-smbs1

blog.pascal-mietlicki.fr/les-meilleurs-outils-edr-gratuits-et-open-source-en-20241

cybermarkagency.com/best-endpoint-detection-and-response-software1

cyberpress.org/edr-solutions-by-business-size1

edrcost.com/microsoft-defender-for-endpoint-pricing1

gbhackers.com/best-edr-solutions-compared1

github.com/wazuh/wazuh1

huntress.com/internal-it-cybersecurity-guide/best-endpoint-protection-for-small-businesses1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as OSQuery

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as OSQuery; a claim can dispute any of them.

osquery 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OSQuery's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OSQuery, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at osquery.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.