AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Norton · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

Norton

11Judge labels
0First choices
7Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Norton was named 2 times in Client-side protection and 1 other category, where cside led with 13%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In client-side protection · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Norton for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Client-side protectionSecurity operations0%96 of 1200%1under 10 labels · led by cside at 13%
Endpoint detection and responseSecurity operations0%50 of 55100%1under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender for Endpoint at 30%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Norton yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Norton across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00011
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid consumer antivirus bundles as EDR substitutes. Heimdal notes that Norton 360 and McAfee are consumer identity/antivirus bundles, not business endpoint platforms” Perplexity Sonar · EDR · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Norton, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Norton was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint6 of 111Not among the top eight
SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint5 of 111Not among the top eight
McAfee5 of 110Not among the top eight
Microsoft Defender for Cloud4 of 113Not among the top eight
Kaspersky4 of 111Not among the top eight
Avast Business3 of 110Not among the top eight
CrowdStrike Falcon3 of 110Not among the top eight
Zscaler3 of 110Not among the top eight
Bitdefender2 of 110Not among the top eight
Broadcom2 of 110Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Norton. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 11 answers that named Norton and are not a share of its labels.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on nortonmediaenterprise.com
347
subdomains included
Content
12
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
1 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog972026-09-27
Comparison332026-09-28

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page nortonmediaenterprise.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Norton

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Norton; a claim can dispute any of them.
Norton 360 1

Follow Norton

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Norton's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Norton, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Norton by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Norton is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Norton, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at nortonmediaenterprise.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.