AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Nokia · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Nokia

9Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Nokia was named 5 times in Data center networking, where Arista Networks led with 27%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In data center networking · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Nokia for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Data center networkingNetwork and edge0%30 of 1650%5under 10 labels · led by Arista Networks at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Nokia yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Nokia across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500101
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Nokia (high reliability in studies)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Data center networking · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Nokia, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Nokia was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Cisco8 of 91Not among the top eight
Arista Networks7 of 93Not among the top eight
Juniper Networks6 of 90Not among the top eight
Extreme Networks3 of 90Not among the top eight
Apstra2 of 90Not among the top eight
HPE2 of 90Not among the top eight
Huawei Data Center Networking2 of 90Not among the top eight
VMware NSX2 of 90Not among the top eight
Infoblox1 of 91Not among the top eight
Big Switch Networks1 of 90Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Nokia. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 9 answers that named Nokia and are not a share of its labels.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on nokia.com
10,000
subdomains included
Content
89
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
3 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Comparison29undated
Case study18undated
Conference or event14undated
Report or ebook12undated
Glossary or explainer7undated
News or press5undated
Webinar or virtual event4undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page nokia.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Nokia

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Nokia; a claim can dispute any of them.
Nokia/SONiC 1

Follow Nokia

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Nokia is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
As a technology leader across mobile, fixed and cloud networks, our solutions enable a more productive, sustainable and inclusive world
Not stated on the pages read
Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What Nokia's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: nokia.com, nokia.com/bell-labs/publications-and-media/publications/pricing-and-bandwidth-allocation-problems-in-wireless-multi-tier-networks, nokia.com/bell-labs/publications-and-media/publications/capabilities-of-bounded-discrepancy-decoding. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Nokia's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Nokia, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Nokia by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Nokia is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Nokia, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at nokia.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.