AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Aiven · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Aiven

22Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
9 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Aiven was named 9 times in Managed databases, where Amazon RDS led with 45%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In managed databases · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Aiven for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Managed relational databasesData platform0%12 of 8211%9under 10 labels · led by Amazon RDS at 45%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Aiven held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Managed databases · by segment

Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 12 → 14 of 70
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 23 → 11 of 72
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 33 → 14 of 81

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Managed databases0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 23 → 12 of 82

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Aiven across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash02002
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2002013
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash01102
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained8 labelsNone
Negative8 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“newer, dedicated Postgres hosts (like Crunchy Bridge or Aiven) deliver significantly better I/O and query throughput” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Managed databases · negative prompt · alternative
“consider cloud-neutral managed services like Aiven, Supabase, Neon, or Crunchy Data” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Managed databases · scale prompt · alternative
“Aiven (multi-cloud Postgres/MySQL) for simpler, cheaper options vs. Big 3” Grok 4.20 · Managed databases · direct prompt · alternative
“If multi-cloud or open-source focus, explore Aiven/Instaclustr.” Grok 4.20 · Managed databases · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Smaller Providers (e.g., Linode/Aiven/DO Managed DBs)... Weaker SLAs/support vs. hyperscalers.” Grok 4.20 · Managed databases · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Aiven, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Aiven was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Amazon RDS18 of 224Not among the top eight
Google Cloud SQL14 of 222Not among the top eight
Azure SQL Database14 of 220Not among the top eight
Neon13 of 221Not among the top eight
PlanetScale13 of 220Not among the top eight
Supabase12 of 223Not among the top eight
Amazon Aurora9 of 222Not among the top eight
DigitalOcean Managed Databases7 of 221Not among the top eight
Crunchy Bridge5 of 220Not among the top eight
Google Cloud Spanner5 of 220Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Aiven. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 22 answers that named Aiven and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

digitalocean.com10
it-ai-index.com10
g2.com9
northflank.com8
tech-insider.org7
cloudinsight.cc6
gitnux.org6
aws.amazon.com5
devtoolreviews.com5
reddit.com5

Seventy-one of the seventy-one domain citations in answers naming Aiven came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

aiven.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Aiven takes 0% of first choices and Amazon RDS takes 45%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “managed relational database service”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “managed relational database services”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
1,600 a month (“aiven”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
21 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 10,024 a month
Searches its site ranks for
2,365 · 213 in the top three
Sites linking to it
3,556
Paid Google search
3 searches its ads show for, about 3 clicks and $59 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 68 text, 29 image, 23 video · 26 shown in the last 30 days

First shown August 2025, as Aiven Oy, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 101 in the year, 19 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 12 of 82 in managed databases
Segment leader
45%
Amazon RDS
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
22 answers
Its own site cited
in 18 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on aiven.io
2,567
subdomains included
Content
1,322
counted in the table below
Documentation
993
Product · Integration
3 · 1
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Template or tool575undated
Blog465242026-09-25ETL
News or press6822026-09-23
Comparison5202025-04-25
Case study4602022-07-04
Webinar or virtual event37undated
Conference or event3432026-09-23
Report or ebook1902021-05-10
Glossary or explainer1302024-09-16ETL
Podcast or video1302024-03-26

Events in person

Last twelve months

As the event pages on aiven.io state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page aiven.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Aiven

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Aiven is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Your AI-ready Open Source Data Platform
For
developers and engineering teams who need production-grade open source data infrastructure without the operational overhead
Price stated
Free tier: PostgreSQL, MySQL, Kafka, OpenSearch and Valkey. No credit card required, no time limit. Developer: From $5/month for PostgreSQL & MySQL as well as OpenSearch, or $35/month for Kafka. Startup: Small production workloads with backup retention and basic high-availability options. Business: Recommended for production. Multi-node clusters with high availability, 14-day backup retention, and the 99.99% uptime SLA. Premium: Enterprise-grade production. Larger cluster sizes, 30-day backup retention, optional synchronous replication, priority support add-ons. All plans include automated backups, monitoring, and no hidden fees. aiven.io
Starting price
From $5/month aiven.io
Free plan or trial
Free tier (no credit card required, no time limit) aiven.io
Certifications
SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001GDPRHIPAA-compliant infrastructureSOC 2HIPAA
Hosting
more than 100 regions worldwideAsia, Bangalore (blr)Asia, Singapore (sgp)Canada, Toronto (tor)Europe, Frankfurt (fra)Europe, London (lon)Europe, Amsterdam (ams)Australia, Sydney (syd)
Customers named
PricelineDecathlonWoltSophosFiverrDojoKroo BankLa Redoute
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations

What Aiven's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: aiven.io, aiven.io/pricing/mysql, aiven.io/developer/security, aiven.io/platform, aiven.io/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Aiven's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Aiven, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Aiven by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Aiven is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Aiven, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at aiven.io is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.