IT AI Index

Index › Products › Mindgard · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Mindgard

12Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

8 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Mindgard was named 4 times in AI security, where SentinelOne Singularity led with 11%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business34 of 147

under the label threshold

Mid-market55 of 233

under the label threshold

Enterprise41 of 155

under the label threshold

In ai security · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Mindgard for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
AI security platforms	Security operations	0%	55 of 233	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by SentinelOne Singularity at 11%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Mindgard yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Mindgard across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative7 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Automated AI red teaming and adversarial testing across OWASP Top 10 and NIST AI RMF vectors.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · AI security · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Mindgard, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mindgard was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Lakera Guard9 of 121Not among the top eight

HiddenLayer6 of 120Not among the top eight

SentinelOne Singularity5 of 120Not among the top eight

Prompt Security4 of 121Not among the top eight

Darktrace4 of 120Not among the top eight

Reco4 of 120Not among the top eight

Wiz AI-SPM3 of 122Not among the top eight

Microsoft Defender XDR3 of 121Not among the top eight

Protect AI3 of 121Not among the top eight

General Analysis3 of 120Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mindgard. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 12 answers that named Mindgard and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

reco.ai6

mindgard.aiYour site5

venn.com5

wiz.io5

aikido.dev4

checkpoint.com4

cybermagazine.com4

cyera.com4

slashdot.org4

witness.ai4

Forty of the forty-five domain citations in answers naming Mindgard came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

reco.ai/compare/ai-security-tools-for-enterprises6

venn.com/learn/ai-security/ai-security-tools5

wiz.io/academy/ai-security/ai-security-tools5

cybermagazine.com/top10/top-10-ai-powered-cybersecurity-solutions4

cyera.com/blog/ai-security-platforms4

aikido.dev/blog/llm-security-tools3

csoonline.com/article/4115785/top-10-vendors-for-ai-enabled-security-according-to-cisos.ht3

generalanalysis.com/guides/best-ai-security-platforms3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

mindgard.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Mindgard takes 0% of first choices and SentinelOne Singularity takes 11%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “ai security platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “ai security platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 480 a month (“mindgard”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 5 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 1,274 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 951 · 19 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 2,087
Paid Google search: 1 searches its ads show for, about 15 clicks and $673 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

13 ads · 13 text · 11 shown in the last 30 days

First shown January 2025, as Mindgard LTD, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 12 in the year, 1 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 55 of 233 in AI security

Segment leader

11%

SentinelOne Singularity

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 12 answers
Its own site cited: in 12 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on mindgard.ai

462

subdomains included

Content

236

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

7 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	171	10	2026-09-12	AI security
Conference or event	27	undated
Comparison	14	0	2026-01-30	BAS
Glossary or explainer	10	0	2026-06-26
Case study	6	undated
Webinar or virtual event	3	undated
Report or ebook	3	undated
Template or tool	2	0	2025-11-17

Most recent

2026-09-12Easy to use ai to develop bioweapons blog
2026-09-08Mindgard ecosystem anthropic nvidia microsoft google cloud aws blog
2026-08-28Ai agent security blog
2026-08-25Mythos isnt an ai security strategy blog
2026-08-14Amazon kiro data exfiltration blog
2026-08-11Mindgard raises 30m series a blog

Events in person

Last twelve months

October 4, 2026 to October 7, 2026OFFENSIVE AI CON 2026San Diego, USA · attended
August 5, 2026Black Hat USA 2026place not stated · exhibited

As the event pages on mindgard.ai state them, read October 5, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page mindgard.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Mindgard

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Mindgard is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: AI Red Teaming & AI Security Solutions
mindgard.ai
For: security and engineering teams accountable for AI systems in development and production
mindgard.ai
Hosting: BostonLondon
Customers named: GoogleOpenAIZED AIxAI
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications

What Mindgard's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: mindgard.ai, mindgard.ai/use-cases/overview, mindgard.ai/learn/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mindgard's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mindgard, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Mindgard by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Mindgard is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Mindgard, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.