IT AI Index

Index › Products › General Analysis · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

General Analysis

3Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

3 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. General Analysis was named 2 times in AI security, where SentinelOne Singularity led with 11%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business107 of 147

under the label threshold

Mid-market100 of 233

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In ai security · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named General Analysis for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
AI security platforms	Security operations	0%	100 of 233	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by SentinelOne Singularity at 11%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for General Analysis yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated General Analysis across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as General Analysis, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and General Analysis was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

HiddenLayer3 of 30Not among the top eight

Mindgard3 of 30Not among the top eight

Prisma AIRS2 of 31Not among the top eight

Cisco AI Defense2 of 30Not among the top eight

Lakera Guard2 of 30Not among the top eight

Lasso2 of 30Not among the top eight

Noma2 of 30Not among the top eight

Patronus2 of 30Not among the top eight

Prompt Security2 of 30Not among the top eight

Wiz AI-SPM1 of 31Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named General Analysis. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named General Analysis and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

generalanalysis.comYour site3

cyera.com2

reco.ai2

venn.com2

witness.ai2

wiz.io2

aioutlooks.com1

checkpoint.com1

confident-ai.com1

csoonline.com1

Fourteen of the seventeen domain citations in answers naming General Analysis came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

generalanalysis.com/guides/best-ai-security-platforms3

cyera.com/blog/ai-security-platforms2

reco.ai/compare/ai-security-tools-for-enterprises2

venn.com/learn/ai-security/ai-security-tools2

witness.ai/blog/ai-security-platform2

wiz.io/academy/ai-security/ai-security-solutions2

wiz.io/academy/ai-security/ai-security-tools2

aioutlooks.com/compare-ai-security-solutions1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on generalanalysis.com

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

12 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Report or ebook	43	24	2026-09-30	AI security
Blog	11	0	2026-04-29
Case study	1	0	2025-05-25

Most recent

2026-09-30Openai dots security controls report or ebook
2026-09-29Sonnet 5 5 cyber fallback report or ebook
2026-09-28Nvidia openshell policy verification report or ebook
2026-09-27Github copilot app opentelemetry report or ebook
2026-09-26Github copilot slack teams context security report or ebook
2026-09-25Github copilot default feature policy report or ebook

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page generalanalysis.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow General Analysis

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

General Analysis is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: AI Red Teaming & LLM Security Platform
generalanalysis.com
For: teams deploying customer support agents
generalanalysis.com/solutions/support-agents
Customers named: Air CanadaNew York CityMcDonald'sChevroletDPDxAI
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What General Analysis's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: generalanalysis.com, generalanalysis.com/security, generalanalysis.com/solutions/support-agents. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when General Analysis's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as General Analysis, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for General Analysis by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where General Analysis is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name General Analysis, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.