AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Microsoft Visio · October 2026 Edition
Microsoft · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Microsoft Visio

5Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Microsoft Visio was named 1 time in EA tools, where SAP LeanIX led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ea tools · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Microsoft Visio for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Enterprise architecture toolsIT operations and endpoint0%49 of 1130%1under 10 labels · led by SAP LeanIX at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Microsoft Visio yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Microsoft Visio across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Verdict: Don't overlook what you may already have.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · EA tools · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Microsoft Visio, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Microsoft Visio was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Ardoq4 of 50Not among the top eight
Bizzdesign Horizzon4 of 50Not among the top eight
Lucidchart3 of 50Not among the top eight
MEGA HOPEX3 of 50Not among the top eight
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect3 of 50Not among the top eight
Archi2 of 51Not among the top eight
Draw.io2 of 50Not among the top eight
LeanIX2 of 50Not among the top eight
Miro2 of 50Not among the top eight
PowerPoint2 of 50Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Microsoft Visio. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Microsoft Visio and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

superblocks.com4
catio.tech3
erstudio.com3
leanix.net3
archiq.app2
ardoq.com2
bizzdesign.com2
bluedolphin.io2
capstera.com2
cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com2

Twenty-five of the twenty-five domain citations in answers naming Microsoft Visio came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Microsoft Visio stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
22,200 a month (“microsoft visio”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
1,019 a month
Its own site
It sits on Microsoft's site (microsoft.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 49 of 113 in EA tools
Segment leader
25%
SAP LeanIX
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
5 answers
Its own site cited
in 5 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Microsoft Visio

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Microsoft is the company behind Microsoft Visio.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Customers named
LenovoVIVIDG&J Pepsi-Cola BottlersVirgin MoneyE.ONMilpark Education
Not stated on the pages read
Positioning, who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Microsoft Visio's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: microsoft.com, microsoft.com/cs-cz/dynamics-365/pricing-overview, trust.microsoft.com, microsoft.com/cs-cz/dynamics-365/solutions/ai, microsoft.com/cs-cz/isv/marketplace. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Microsoft Visio's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Microsoft Visio, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Microsoft Visio by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Microsoft Visio is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Microsoft Visio, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at microsoft.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.