AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Magic Transit · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Magic Transit

4Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Magic Transit was named 1 time in DDoS, where Cloudflare led with 82%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ddos · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Magic Transit for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
DDoS protectionNetwork and edge0%26 of 580%1under 10 labels · led by Cloudflare at 82%

Movement

Since September 2026, Magic Transit held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · DDoS · by segment

EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 15 of 41, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
DDoS0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 26 of 58, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Magic Transit across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“broad protection for routed network traffic is a separate Enterprise product, Magic Transit” GPT-6 Luna · DDoS · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Magic Transit, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Magic Transit was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Cloudflare4 of 42Not among the top eight
AWS Shield4 of 40Not among the top eight
Akamai Prolexic4 of 40Not among the top eight
Azure DDoS Protection2 of 40Not among the top eight
Google Cloud Armor2 of 40Not among the top eight
F5 Distributed Cloud1 of 40Not among the top eight
Imperva DDoS Protection1 of 40Not among the top eight
Radware Cloud DDoS Protection1 of 40Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Magic Transit. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Magic Transit and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

developers.cloudflare.com2
docs.cloud.google.com2
81fab744.previews.developers.cloudflare.com1
akamai.com1
aws.amazon.com1
cipherssecurity.com1
cloud.google.com1
cloudflare.com1
cybersecuritynews.com1
docs.aws.amazon.com1

No domain is on file for Magic Transit, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow Magic Transit

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Magic Transit's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Magic Transit, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Magic Transit by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Magic Transit is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Magic Transit, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.