Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 25 of 54, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedLLMGateway
1Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
1 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. LLMGateway was named 1 time in LLM gateways, where LiteLLM led with 31%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market29 of 69
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In llm gateways · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named LLMGateway for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLM gateways and observability | Data platform | 0% | 29 of 69 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by LiteLLM at 31% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, LLMGateway held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · LLM gateways · by segment
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLM gateways | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 29 of 69, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated LLMGateway across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated LLMGateway across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative1 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“SOC 2 Type II compliant, offers good security features” MiniMax M2.5 · LLM gateways · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as LLMGateway, over the 1 answer that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LLMGateway was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as LLMGateway, over the 1 answer that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LLMGateway was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LLMGateway. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 1 answers that named LLMGateway and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
bankinfosecurity.com1
coverbase.com1
dataiku.com1
docs.litellm.ai1
docs.llmgateway.ioYour site1
gateway-llm.com1
kanerika.com1
linkedin.com1
llmgateway.ioYour site1
markaicode.com1
Eight of the ten domain citations in answers naming LLMGateway came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
llmgateway.io ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, LLMGateway takes 0% of first choices and LiteLLM takes 31%.ShowHide
Search and answers
llmgateway.io ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, LLMGateway takes 0% of first choices and LiteLLM takes 31%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “llm gateway”
1
Position for “llm gateways”
–
not in the top ten
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,222 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,402 · 5 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 667
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 29 of 69 in LLM gateways
Segment leader
31%
LiteLLM
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 1 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 1 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on llmgateway.io
1,098
subdomains included
Content
194
counted in the table below
Documentation
208
Product · Integration
19 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 78 | 39 | 2026-09-28 | LLM gateways | |
| Comparison | 43 | 12 | 2026-08-24 | LLM gateways | |
| Glossary or explainer | 41 | 1 | 2026-08-15 | LLM gateways | |
| Report or ebook | 27 | 23 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Template or tool | 5 | 1 | 2026-08-04 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Perplexity search api blog
- 2026-09-26Smart routing benchmark blog
- 2026-09-25Automatic model selection blog
- 2026-09-25Llm routing savings 100k blog
- 2026-09-23Compliance alerts blog
- 2026-09-23Anvil report or ebook
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page llmgateway.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow LLMGateway
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
LLMGateway is its own company.ShowHide
The company
LLMGateway is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- open-source LLM API gateway
- For
- Company-wide AI
- Price stated
- Bring your own provider keys at no platform fee. Credits are pay-as-you-go with a 5% platform fee on top-ups and no token markup; non-US cards may add a 1.5% international card fee. Optional full data retention costs $0.01 per 1M tokens in both modes. Enterprise pricing is custom, with volume discounts and a 99.9% uptime SLA on Enterprise Cloud. llmgateway.io
- Starting price
- Free llmgateway.io
- Free plan or trial
- Just building? Sign up free, no credit card. Start your 30-day pilot. llmgateway.io
- Integrations claimed
- 40 llmgateway.io/pricing · 200 llmgateway.io/products/lounge pages disagree
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type II compliantSAML SSOSCIMSOC 2ISO 27001GDPRSOC 2 Type II
- Hosting
- Sydney, Australia
- Customers named
- SamsungHarvardColoop.aiFieldKo
What LLMGateway's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: llmgateway.io, llmgateway.io/pricing, llmgateway.io/enterprise/compliance, llmgateway.io/products/lounge, llmgateway.io/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LLMGateway's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LLMGateway, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for LLMGateway by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where LLMGateway is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name LLMGateway, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.