Index › Products › Leapsome · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Leapsome

4Judge labels

3First choices

0Negative labels

4 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Leapsome was named 4 times in DEX, where ControlUp led with 13%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market6 of 219

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In dex · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Leapsome for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Digital employee experience	IT operations and endpoint	6%	6 of 219	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by ControlUp at 13%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Leapsome yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Leapsome across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labels3

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Pick Leapsome if your priority is people engagement, performance and learning in one HR stack” Muse Glimmer 30B · DEX · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Leapsome and Workleap are often highlighted as the most balanced options” Mistral Small · DEX · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Best Overall Recommendation: Leapsome” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DEX · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Both are considered the "gold standards" for mid-sized B2B companies.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DEX · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Leapsome, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Leapsome was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Workleap3 of 40Not among the top eight

ControlUp2 of 41Not among the top eight

Microsoft Viva2 of 40Not among the top eight

Nexthink Infinity2 of 40Not among the top eight

TeamViewer DEX2 of 40Not among the top eight

15Five1 of 40Not among the top eight

Aternity1 of 40Not among the top eight

CultureAmp1 of 40Not among the top eight

HubEngage1 of 40Not among the top eight

Lakeside1 of 40Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Leapsome. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Leapsome and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

firsthr.app3

monday.com3

achievers.com2

flexxible.com2

gable.to2

lumapps.com2

simpplr.com2

staffbase.com2

teamviewer.com2

workhuman.com2

No domain is on file for Leapsome, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

firsthr.app/compare/general/employee-experience-platform3

monday.com/blog/service/employee-experience-tools3

gable.to/blog/post/employee-experience-software2

lumapps.com/insights/blog/best-employee-experience-platforms2

simpplr.com/blog/best-employee-experience-platform2

staffbase.com/blog/best-employee-experience-platform2

workhuman.com/blog/employee-experience-software2

achievers.com/blog/employee-engagement-software-platforms1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Leapsome stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 2,900 a month (“leapsome”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 32 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 6 of 219 in DEX

Segment leader

13%

ControlUp

First choices: 3 across its categories
Named in: 4 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Leapsome

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Leapsome's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Leapsome, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Leapsome by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Leapsome is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Leapsome, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.