IT AI Index

Index › Products › JFrog Cloud · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

JFrog Cloud

2Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

2 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. JFrog Cloud was named 1 time in Artifact registries, where JFrog Artifactory led with 14%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business61 of 86

under the label threshold

Mid-market81 of 89

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In artifact registries · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named JFrog Cloud for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Artifact and container registries	Developer platform	0%	81 of 89	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by JFrog Artifactory at 14%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for JFrog Cloud yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated JFrog Cloud across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Skip cloud-hosted options (like JFrog Cloud or Cloudsmith)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Artifact registries · budget prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as JFrog Cloud, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and JFrog Cloud was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Sonatype Nexus Repository OSS1 of 21Not among the top eight

AWS CodeArtifact1 of 20Not among the top eight

Cloudsmith1 of 20Not among the top eight

DevPI1 of 20Not among the top eight

GitHub Packages1 of 20Not among the top eight

GitLab Package Registry1 of 20Not among the top eight

Harbor1 of 20Not among the top eight

JFrog Artifactory OSS1 of 20Not among the top eight

JFrog Artifactory Open Source1 of 20Not among the top eight

Nexus Repository OSS1 of 20Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named JFrog Cloud. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named JFrog Cloud and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cloudrepo.io2

alternativeto.net1

byteplus.com1

docs.gitlab.com1

forgerepo.com1

github.com1

hokstadconsulting.com1

imaginarycloud.com1

itechguides.com1

jfrog.comYour site1

Ten of the eleven domain citations in answers naming JFrog Cloud came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

alternativeto.net/software/artifactory1

byteplus.com/en/topic/5791571

cloudrepo.io/articles/artifact-management-guide1

cloudrepo.io/articles/best-artifactory-alternatives1

docs.gitlab.com/administration/packages1

docs.gitlab.com/artifact-registry/repositories1

docs.gitlab.com/user/packages1

docs.gitlab.com/user/packages/generic_packages1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

jfrog.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, JFrog Cloud takes 0% of first choices and JFrog Artifactory takes 14%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “artifact repository”

Position for “best artifact repository”

–

not in the top ten

Organic visits to its site: about 38,697 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 5,782 · 542 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 13,298
Paid Google search: 3 searches its ads show for, about 5 clicks and $37 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

120+ ads · 106 text, 12 image, 2 video · 120 shown in the last 30 days

First shown August 2023, as JFrog, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 29 in the year, 91 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 81 of 89 in artifact registries

Segment leader

14%

JFrog Artifactory

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 2 answers
Its own site cited: in 2 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on jfrog.com

10,009

subdomains included

Content

1,635

counted in the table below

Documentation

6,096

Product · Integration

14 · 125

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	959	0	2021-04-07	SIEM, SAST
Webinar or virtual event	210	0	2026-03-11	IaC, SAST
Glossary or explainer	139	1	2026-07-28	IaC, SAST
News or press	106	undated
Report or ebook	91	undated
Comparison	59	undated
Conference or event	43	1	2026-07-28
Case study	18	undated
Template or tool	9	0	2021-02-09
Podcast or video	1	0	2022-05-05

Most recent

2026-07-28What is artifactory jfrog glossary or explainer
2026-07-28Jfrog to present at upcoming investor conferences 3 conference or event
2026-03-11Webinar recap forrester tool consolidation future of appsec webinar or virtual event
2022-05-058 of the best machine learning podcasts to listen to in 2022 podcast or video
2021-04-07Npm flies with jfrog cli blog
2021-02-09Cloud native ci cd the ultimate checklist template or tool

Events in person

Last twelve months

August 12, 2026Canaccord Genuity Annual Growth ConferenceBoston, United States · spoke
August 10, 2026KeyBanc Technology Leadership ForumDeer Valley, United States · spoke

As the event pages on jfrog.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page jfrog.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow JFrog Cloud

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

JFrog Cloud is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: The Single Source of Truth for the Agentic Software Supply Chain
jfrog.com
For: DevOps, DevSecOps, DevGovOps, and AgentSecOps
jfrog.com
Price stated: SaaS Self-Managed jfrog.com/pricing
Starting price: 150 jfrog.com/pricing
Free plan or trial: Free Trial jfrog.com
Integrations claimed: 100 jfrog.com
Certifications: HIPAAFedRAMPCVE Numbering Authority (CNA)
Hosting: 30 locations across 3 cloud providersAmazon AWSMicrosoft AzureGoogle Cloud
Customers named: FFF EnterprisesDeloitteSpot (by NetApp)Serving over 80% of the Fortune 100

What JFrog Cloud's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: jfrog.com, jfrog.com/pricing, jfrog.com/trust, jfrog.com/platform, jfrog.com/about/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when JFrog Cloud's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as JFrog Cloud, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for JFrog Cloud by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where JFrog Cloud is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name JFrog Cloud, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.