AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › JFrog Artifactory OSS · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

JFrog Artifactory OSS

7Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. JFrog Artifactory OSS was named 3 times in Artifact registries, where JFrog Artifactory led with 14%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In artifact registries · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named JFrog Artifactory OSS for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Artifact and container registriesDeveloper platform0%47 of 8933%3under 10 labels · led by JFrog Artifactory at 14%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for JFrog Artifactory OSS yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated JFrog Artifactory OSS across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00011
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“also viable if your team already uses JFrog or needs specific Artifactory workflows” GPT-5.4 mini · Artifact registries · budget prompt · alternative
“The Runner-Up: JFrog Artifactory OSS” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Artifact registries · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Free but with significant feature restrictions — notably, no npm or PyPI support in the free tier” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Artifact registries · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as JFrog Artifactory OSS, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and JFrog Artifactory OSS was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
GitHub Packages6 of 70Not among the top eight
Sonatype Nexus Repository OSS5 of 74Not among the top eight
Harbor5 of 70Not among the top eight
AWS CodeArtifact2 of 71Not among the top eight
Cloudsmith2 of 70Not among the top eight
GitLab Package Registry2 of 70Not among the top eight
Verdaccio2 of 70Not among the top eight
Sonatype Nexus Repository1 of 71Not among the top eight
AWS ECR1 of 70Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named JFrog Artifactory OSS. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named JFrog Artifactory OSS and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cloudrepo.io6
itechguides.com6
jfrog.comYour site5
imaginarycloud.com4
sonatype.com4
thectoclub.com4
harness.io3
hokstadconsulting.com3
safeguard.sh3
zairalabs.ai3

Thirty-six of the forty-one domain citations in answers naming JFrog Artifactory OSS came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

jfrog.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, JFrog Artifactory OSS takes 0% of first choices and JFrog Artifactory takes 14%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “artifact repository”
1
Position for “best artifact repository”
–
not in the top ten
Organic visits to its site
about 38,697 a month
Searches its site ranks for
5,782 · 542 in the top three
Sites linking to it
13,298
Paid Google search
3 searches its ads show for, about 5 clicks and $37 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 106 text, 12 image, 2 video · 120 shown in the last 30 days

First shown August 2023, as JFrog, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 29 in the year, 91 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 47 of 89 in artifact registries
Segment leader
14%
JFrog Artifactory
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
7 answers
Its own site cited
in 7 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on jfrog.com
10,009
subdomains included
Content
1,635
counted in the table below
Documentation
6,096
Product · Integration
14 · 125
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog95902021-04-07SIEM, SAST
Webinar or virtual event21002026-03-11IaC, SAST
Glossary or explainer13912026-07-28IaC, SAST
News or press106undated
Report or ebook91undated
Comparison59undated
Conference or event4312026-07-28
Case study18undated
Template or tool902021-02-09
Podcast or video102022-05-05

Most recent

Events in person

Last twelve months

As the event pages on jfrog.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page jfrog.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as JFrog Artifactory OSS

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as JFrog Artifactory OSS; a claim can dispute any of them.
JFrog Artifactory OSS (Community Edition) 1JFrog Artifactory OSS / Community options 1

Follow JFrog Artifactory OSS

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

JFrog Artifactory OSS is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The Universal Private Registry for all Binaries and AI Artifacts.
For
small teams
Price stated
$50 / Month jfrog.com/pricing
Starting price
$50 / Month jfrog.com/pricing
Free plan or trial
Free Trial jfrog.com
Integrations claimed
100 jfrog.com/pricing
Hosting
30 locations across 3 cloud providers
Customers named
Serving over 80% of the Fortune 100Credit KarmaFFF EnterprisesDeloitteTechnology Innovation InstituteInformaticaOracle
Not stated on the pages read
Certifications

What JFrog Artifactory OSS's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: jfrog.com, jfrog.com/pricing, jfrog.com/trust, jfrog.com/platform, jfrog.com/about/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when JFrog Artifactory OSS's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as JFrog Artifactory OSS, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for JFrog Artifactory OSS by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where JFrog Artifactory OSS is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name JFrog Artifactory OSS, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at jfrog.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.