AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › HUMAN Bot Defender · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

HUMAN Bot Defender

11Judge labels
1First choices
4Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. HUMAN Bot Defender was named 3 times in Bot management, where Cloudflare Bot Management led with 56%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In bot management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named HUMAN Bot Defender for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Bot managementNetwork and edge0%23 of 830%3under 10 labels · led by Cloudflare Bot Management at 56%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for HUMAN Bot Defender yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated HUMAN Bot Defender across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00101
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labels1
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for: If you have significant API exposure or mobile app presence.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Bot management · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as HUMAN Bot Defender, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HUMAN Bot Defender was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Akamai Bot Manager8 of 110Not among the top eight
Cloudflare Bot Management7 of 114Not among the top eight
Imperva Advanced Bot Protection6 of 110Not among the top eight
DataDome5 of 110Not among the top eight
DataDome Bot Protect4 of 110Not among the top eight
F5 Distributed Cloud Bot Defense4 of 110Not among the top eight
Radware Bot Manager3 of 110Not among the top eight
AWS WAF + Bot Control2 of 110Not among the top eight
Indusface AppTrana2 of 110Not among the top eight
Kasada Bot Defense2 of 110Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named HUMAN Bot Defender. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named HUMAN Bot Defender and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

datadome.co7
g2.com7
developers.cloudflare.com6
indusface.com6
securityboulevard.com6
cequence.ai5
radware.com5
expertinsights.com4
forrester.com4
akamai.com3

Fifty-three of the fifty-three domain citations in answers naming HUMAN Bot Defender came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

humansecurity.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, HUMAN Bot Defender takes 0% of first choices and Cloudflare Bot Management takes 56%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “bot management solution”
5
Position for “bot management solutions”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
20 a month (“human bot defender”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
0 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 165,749 a month
Searches its site ranks for
6,795 · 230 in the top three
Sites linking to it
4,987
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
57 ads · 53 text, 2 image, 2 video · 23 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2023, as HUMAN SECURITY, INC., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 33 in the year, 24 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 23 of 83 in bot management
Segment leader
56%
Cloudflare Bot Management
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
11 answers
Its own site cited
in 11 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on humansecurity.com
1,534
subdomains included
Content
19
counted in the table below
Documentation
1,510
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Conference or event1902025-11-01

Most recent

  • 2025-11-0112 conference or event
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page humansecurity.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as HUMAN Bot Defender

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as HUMAN Bot Defender; a claim can dispute any of them.
HUMAN (formerly White Ops) Bot Defender 1

Follow HUMAN Bot Defender

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when HUMAN Bot Defender's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HUMAN Bot Defender, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for HUMAN Bot Defender by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where HUMAN Bot Defender is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name HUMAN Bot Defender, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at humansecurity.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.