| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise storage systems | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 38 of 167 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Dell PowerStore at 16% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“good if you want a modern managed experience and already use HPE infrastructure” GPT-5.4 mini · Enterprise storage · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Strong focus on cloud-managed, AI-driven operations (InfoSight).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Enterprise storage · scale prompt · alternative
“with HPE Alletra 1000 / Nimble AF as the close competitor” Muse Glimmer 30B · Enterprise storage · budget prompt · alternative
“HPE Alletra — Replacement for 3PAR/Nimble” Kimi K2 · Enterprise storage · negative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 26 answers that named HPE Alletra and are not a share of its labels.
Seventy-three of the eighty-two domain citations in answers naming HPE Alletra came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What HPE Alletra's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-alletra-storage/alletra-6000/td-p/7187723, community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-alletra-storage/alletra-6000/td-p/7134087, community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-alletra-storage/alletra-5010h/td-p/7245139, community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-alletra-storage/alletra-config/td-p/7216895, community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-alletra-storage/alletra-5030-dhci/td-p/7270928. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when HPE Alletra's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HPE Alletra, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for HPE Alletra by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: