One category · what the models named insteadAlternatives to GitHub, as AI models named them
In the October 2026 Edition, 78 of the 252 answers collected in the one category where GitHub holds a standing named it neither as a first choice nor as an alternative. These are the products those answers put first, category by category and buyer by buyer. The output is the models' output.
Source control hosting
Nineteen of the eighty-four answers did not name GitHub; it was the first choice in fifty-nine. The first choices in those nineteen answers, three products in all:
The full small business standing →Thirty of the eighty-four answers did not name GitHub; it was the first choice in forty-seven. The first choices in those thirty answers, four products in all:
The full mid-market standing →Twenty-nine of the eighty-four answers did not name GitHub; it was the first choice in forty-three. The first choices in those twenty-nine answers, nine products in all, the eight most named:
How to read this
A category is asked six ways of each of fourteen models on behalf of each buyer segment, so a segment is eighty-four answers. An answer belongs on this page when the judge labeled GitHub neither its first choice nor an alternative in it; the products listed are the first choices those answers made, counted once per answer. An answer that named nothing first, or named GitHub only in passing, is in the denominator and adds to no product. The counts are not the category standing, which is on the category page with its share and rank; they are the same record read from GitHub's side.
Every answer and every label behind these figures is in the record, sent on request. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index, and a product named instead of GitHub was named by a model, not endorsed by anyone.