Index › Products › GestiÓIP · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

GestiÓIP

6Judge labels

4First choices

0Negative labels

5 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. GestiÓIP was named 4 times in DDI and IPAM, where BlueCat Micetro led with 15%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business14 of 103

under the label threshold

Mid-market7 of 115

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In ddi and ipam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named GestiÓIP for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
DDI and IP address management	Network and edge	6%	7 of 115	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by BlueCat Micetro at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for GestiÓIP yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated GestiÓIP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 label1

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained4 labels3

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“most budget-constrained teams start with phpIPAM or GestiÓIP for IPAM plus existing BIND/Windows DNS/DHCP” Muse Glimmer 30B · DDI and IPAM · budget prompt · first choice

“the best DDI (DNS, DHCP, IPAM) platform is likely an open-source solution like GestiÓIP” Grok 4.1 Fast · DDI and IPAM · budget prompt · first choice

“If you want a free, self-hosted solution, GestióIP is a strong choice.” Mistral Small · DDI and IPAM · budget prompt · first choice

“Open-source or lighter-weight options noted for smaller teams.” Perplexity Sonar · DDI and IPAM · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as GestiÓIP, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and GestiÓIP was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

phpIPAM5 of 61Not among the top eight

BlueCat Integrity3 of 61Not among the top eight

Infoblox3 of 61Not among the top eight

EfficientIP SOLIDserver2 of 60Not among the top eight

ManageEngine DDI Central2 of 60Not among the top eight

ManageEngine OpUtils2 of 60Not among the top eight

Micetro2 of 60Not among the top eight

SolarWinds IP Address Manager2 of 60Not among the top eight

BloxOne DDI1 of 60Not among the top eight

BlueCat Micetro1 of 60Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named GestiÓIP. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named GestiÓIP and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

itechguides.com6

sourceforge.net5

zipdo.co5

findalternatives.net4

gitnux.org4

guideflow.com4

blog.domotz.com3

devopsschool.com3

peerspot.com3

us.fitgap.com3

No domain is on file for GestiÓIP, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

itechguides.com/best/ddi-management-platform5

findalternatives.net/categories/ddi-management-platform4

itechguides.com/best/ip-address-management-software4

blog.domotz.com/all/ipam-solutions3

devopsschool.com/blog/top-10-ddi-dns-dhcp-ipam-platforms-features-pros-cons-comparison3

gitnux.org/best/ddi-software3

peerspot.com/categories/ddi3

ctacquisitions.com/best-due-diligence-platforms-20262

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as GestiÓIP

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as GestiÓIP; a claim can dispute any of them.

GestióIP 2

Follow GestiÓIP

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when GestiÓIP's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as GestiÓIP, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for GestiÓIP by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where GestiÓIP is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name GestiÓIP, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.