Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 6 → 9 of 35
1 category · RankedFlowtriq
15Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in DDoS for small business buyers
Rank 13 of 58 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 5 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business8 of 38
0%10 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market13 of 58
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In ddos · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Flowtriq for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DDoS protection | Network and edge | 0% | 13 of 58 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Cloudflare at 82% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Flowtriq held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · DDoS · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 of 52, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DDoS | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 13 of 58 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Flowtriq across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Flowtriq across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained11 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Combine with Cloudflare Free tier for edge protection + Flowtriq detection under $15/month total” Qwen 3.7 Flash · DDoS · budget prompt · alternative
“Small businesses or startups can use Cloudflare Free plus Flowtriq for a total cost under $50/month” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DDoS · budget prompt · alternative
“FlowTriq offers per-node protection at $9.99/node/month, which can be a good fit for game servers” Mistral Small · DDoS · budget prompt · alternative
“Flowtriq detection | ~$10/month | Real-time attack detection and alerts” Kimi K2 · DDoS · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Flowtriq, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Flowtriq was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Flowtriq, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Flowtriq was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Flowtriq. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named Flowtriq and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
flowtriq.comYour site15
esecurityplanet.com10
geekflare.com8
indusface.com8
sourceforge.net8
cyberpress.org7
slashdot.org7
cloudflare.com4
dev.to4
tech-insider.org4
Sixty of the seventy-five domain citations in answers naming Flowtriq came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
flowtriq.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Flowtriq takes 0% of first choices and Cloudflare takes 82%.ShowHide
Search and answers
flowtriq.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Flowtriq takes 0% of first choices and Cloudflare takes 82%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “ddos protection service”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “ddos protection services”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 10 a month (“flowtriq”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 245 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 384 · 6 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 320
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 13 of 58 in ddos
Segment leader
82%
Cloudflare
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 15 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 15 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on flowtriq.com
587
subdomains included
Content
440
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
48 · 20
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 326 | 14 | 2026-08-04 | DDoS, SIEM | |
| Comparison | 69 | 2 | 2026-07-10 | DDoS | |
| Template or tool | 34 | 0 | 2026-05-20 | DDoS | |
| Glossary or explainer | 5 | 0 | 2026-06-14 | DDoS | |
| Case study | 2 | 0 | 2026-06-19 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | 1 | 2026-07-10 | DDoS | |
| Conference or event | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-08-04Directadmin ddos protection plugin blog
- 2026-08-04Blesta ddos protection module setup blog
- 2026-08-04Virtualizor auto ddos monitoring blog
- 2026-08-04Solusvm ddos protection integration blog
- 2026-07-23Open source ecosystem contributions blog
- 2026-07-23Dnsdist webhook dynamic blocks blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page flowtriq.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Flowtriq
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Flowtriq; a claim can dispute any of them.
FlowTriq 1Flowtriq detection 1
Follow Flowtriq
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Flowtriq is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Flowtriq is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Real-Time DDoS Detection & Auto-Mitigation for Servers
- For
- infrastructure teams
- Price stated
- $7.99/node/mo billed annually, $9.99 monthly; from $19/source/mo flowtriq.com
- Starting price
- $7.99 flowtriq.com
- Free plan or trial
- 14-day free trial flowtriq.com
- Integrations claimed
- 18 flowtriq.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2PCI
- Hosting
- Canada
- Customers named
- Lorikeet SecurityEU Network Operator
What Flowtriq's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: flowtriq.com, flowtriq.com/pricing, flowtriq.com/security, flowtriq.com/features/ioc, flowtriq.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Flowtriq's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Flowtriq, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Flowtriq by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Flowtriq is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Flowtriq, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.