Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 86 → 83 of 84
Facebook Live
17Judge labels
1First choices
10Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
8 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Facebook Live was named 8 times in Streaming, where Confluent Cloud led with 39%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business87 of 88
0%9 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market20 of 98
2%8 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In streaming · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Facebook Live for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Streaming platforms | Data platform | 2% | 20 of 98 | 50% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Confluent Cloud at 39% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Facebook Live held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Streaming · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 72 → 19 of 94
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Streaming | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 72 → 20 of 98 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Facebook Live across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Facebook Live across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained6 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative10 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you want zero cost, YouTube or Facebook Live are excellent.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Streaming · budget prompt · first choice
“YouTube Live or Facebook Live for basic event streaming” Perplexity Sonar · Streaming · budget prompt · alternative
“The Absolute Cheapest Option: YouTube Live or Facebook Live” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Streaming · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Facebook Live: "Cannot stream published music."... public consumer platforms are generally avoided for confidential, regulated or internal events” Muse Glimmer 30B · Streaming · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid free social platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Twitch) for mission-critical paid events” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Streaming · negative prompt · hard negative
“No technical support, copyright strikes can kill your stream mid-event” Kimi K2 · Streaming · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid: Facebook/Instagram/YouTube Live for professional use.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Streaming · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Facebook Live, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Facebook Live was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Facebook Live, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Facebook Live was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Facebook Live. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 17 answers that named Facebook Live and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
dacast.com16
uscreen.tv10
devopsschool.com9
eventlive.pro6
g2.com5
myhospitalnow.com5
redpanda.com5
uschamber.com5
byteplus.com4
candidstudios.net4
No domain is on file for Facebook Live, so its own site is not marked.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Facebook Live stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Facebook Live stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 8,100 a month (“facebook live”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 5,366 a month
- Its own site
- No site of its own on file, so no site figures
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 20 of 98 in streaming
Segment leader
39%
Confluent Cloud
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 17 answers
- Its own site cited
- No site on file to match
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Facebook Live
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Facebook Live; a claim can dispute any of them.
Facebook Live / Instagram Live / YouTube Live 1
Follow Facebook Live
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Facebook Live's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Facebook Live, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Facebook Live by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Facebook Live is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Facebook Live, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.