IT AI Index
Index Vendors › EdgeOne · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

EdgeOne

5Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
4 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in DDoS for mid-market buyers
Rank 3 of 51 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 1 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ddos · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named EdgeOne for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
DDoS protectionNetwork and edge2%3 of 510%1under 10 labels · led by Cloudflare at 93%
Content delivery networksNetwork and edge0%11 of 400%3under 10 labels · led by Cloudflare at 80%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for EdgeOne yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated EdgeOne across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX11002
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labels1
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“a cloud‑based, always‑on, unmetered provider (Cloudflare, EdgeOne, ...) will give you the best blend of capacity, speed, and cost predictability” GLM 4.7 FlashX · DDoS · scale prompt · first choice
“Consider EdgeOne If: Your audience is in the Asia-Pacific region” GLM 4.7 FlashX · CDN · budget prompt · alternative
“Best for: Companies targeting Asia-Pacific regions” Kimi K2 · CDN · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as EdgeOne, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and EdgeOne was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Cloudflare5 of 54Not in the top three
Bunny.net3 of 50Not in the top three
KeyCDN3 of 50Not in the top three
Akamai Prolexic2 of 51Not in the top three
Imperva2 of 51Not in the top three
AWS Shield2 of 50Not in the top three
BelugaCDN2 of 50Not in the top three
Fastly2 of 50Not in the top three
Akamai1 of 50Not in the top three
Azure DDoS Protection1 of 50Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named EdgeOne. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named EdgeOne and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

edgeone.aiYour site5
accio.com3
best4beginners.com3
cyberpress.org2
cybersecuritynews.com2
flowtriq.com2
imperva.com2
stormwall.network2
astravconsulting.com1
blog.blazingcdn.com1

Eighteen of the twenty-three domain citations in answers naming EdgeOne came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when EdgeOne's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as EdgeOne, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at edgeone.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.